Addressing the implementation challenge of risk prediction model due to missing risk factors: The submodel approximation approach

被引:0
作者
Sun, Tianyi [1 ]
McCoy, Allison B. [2 ]
Storrow, Alan B. [3 ]
Liu, Dandan [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Biostat, 2525 West End Ave,Suite 1100, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Biomed Informat, Nashville, TN USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
关键词
clinical prediction model; electronic health records; implementation; missing risk factors; REAL-TIME IMPUTATION; VALUES;
D O I
10.1002/sim.10184
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Clinical prediction models have been widely acknowledged as informative tools providing evidence-based support for clinical decision making. However, prediction models are often underused in clinical practice due to many reasons including missing information upon real-time risk calculation in electronic health records (EHR) system. Existing literature to address this challenge focuses on statistical comparison of various approaches while overlooking the feasibility of their implementation in EHR. In this article, we propose a novel and feasible submodel approach to address this challenge for prediction models developed using the model approximation (also termed "preconditioning") method. The proposed submodel coefficients are equivalent to the corresponding original prediction model coefficients plus a correction factor. Comprehensive simulations were conducted to assess the performance of the proposed method and compared with the existing "one-step-sweep" approach as well as the imputation approach. In general, the simulation results show the preconditioning-based submodel approach is robust to various heterogeneity scenarios and is comparable to the imputation-based approach, while the "one-step-sweep" approach is less robust under certain heterogeneity scenarios. The proposed method was applied to facilitate real-time implementation of a prediction model to identify emergency department patients with acute heart failure who can be safely discharged home.
引用
收藏
页码:4984 / 4999
页数:16
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Prediction by supervised principal components
    Bair, E
    Hastie, T
    Paul, D
    Tibshirani, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 101 (473) : 119 - 137
  • [2] Reporting and Methods in Clinical Prediction Research: A Systematic Review
    Bouwmeester, Walter
    Zuithoff, Nicolaas P. A.
    Mallett, Susan
    Geerlings, Mirjam I.
    Vergouwe, Yvonne
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2012, 9 (05)
  • [3] Identification of Emergency Department Patients With Acute Heart Failure at Low Risk for 30-Day Adverse Events The STRATIFY Decision Tool
    Collins, Sean P.
    Jenkins, Cathy A.
    Harrell, Frank E., Jr.
    Liu, Dandan
    Miller, Karen F.
    Lindsell, Christopher J.
    Naftilan, Allen J.
    McPherson, John A.
    Maron, David J.
    Sawyer, Douglas B.
    Weintraub, Neal L.
    Fermann, Gregory J.
    Roll, Susan K.
    Sperling, Matthew
    Storrow, Alan B.
    [J]. JACC-HEART FAILURE, 2015, 3 (10) : 737 - 747
  • [4] A computerised decision support system for cardiovascular risk management 'live' in the electronic health record environment: development, validation and implementation-the Utrecht Cardiovascular Cohort Initiative
    Groenhof, T. K. J.
    Rittersma, Z. H.
    Bots, M. L.
    Brandjes, M.
    Jacobs, J. J. L.
    Grobbee, D. E.
    van Solinge, W. W.
    Visseren, F. L. J.
    Haitjema, S.
    Asselbergs, F. W.
    de Jong, Pim A.
    Verhaar, Marianne C.
    Visseren, Frank L. J.
    Asselbergs, Folkert W.
    van der Kaaij, Niels P.
    Hofer, Imo E.
    de Borst, Gert-Jan
    Ruigrok, Ynte M.
    Hollander, Monika
    Dieleman, Stefan M.
    Lely, A. Titia
    Emmelot-Vonk, Marielle H.
    Bots, Michiel L.
    [J]. NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 27 (09) : 435 - 442
  • [5] Harrell FE, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P909, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<909::AID-SIM753>3.3.CO
  • [6] 2-F
  • [7] Handling missing predictor values when validating and applying a prediction model to new patients
    Hoogland, Jeroen
    van Barreveld, Marit
    Debray, Thomas P. A.
    Reitsma, Johannes B.
    Verstraelen, Tom E.
    Dijkgraaf, Marcel G. W.
    Zwinderman, Aeilko H.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 39 (25) : 3591 - 3607
  • [8] Dealing with Missing Predictor Values When Applying Clinical Prediction Models
    Janssen, Kristel J. M.
    Vergouwe, Yvonne
    Donders, A. Rogier T.
    Harrell, Frank E., Jr.
    Chen, Qingxia
    Grobbee, Diederick E.
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2009, 55 (05) : 994 - 1001
  • [9] Prospective prediction in the presence of missing data
    Marshall, G
    Warner, B
    MaWhinney, S
    Hammermeister, K
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (04) : 561 - 570
  • [10] The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research
    Morris, Zoe Slote
    Wooding, Steven
    Grant, Jonathan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2011, 104 (12) : 510 - 520