ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pretreatment Evaluation and Follow-Up of Invasive Cancer of the Cervix: 2023 Update

被引:1
|
作者
Shinagare, Atul B. [1 ]
Burk, Kristine S. [2 ]
Kilcoyne, Aoife [3 ]
Akin, Esma A. [4 ,5 ]
Chuang, Linus [6 ]
Hindman, Nicole M. [7 ]
Huang, Chenchan [8 ]
Rauch, Gaiane M. [9 ]
Small, William, Jr. [10 ,11 ]
Stein, Erica B. [12 ]
Venkatesan, Aradhana M. [9 ]
Kang, Stella K. [13 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA USA
[4] George Washington Univ, Med Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[5] Commiss Nucl Med & Mol Imaging, Washington, DC USA
[6] Univ Vermont, Larner Coll Med, Danbury Hosp, Burlington, VT USA
[7] NYU, Sch Med, New York, NY USA
[8] NYU, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[9] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[10] Loyola Univ Chicago, Stritch Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Cardinal Bernardin Canc Ctr, Maywood, IL USA
[11] Commiss Radiat Oncol, Maywood, IL USA
[12] Univ Michigan, Med Ctr, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[13] NYU, Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
关键词
Appropriateness Criteria; appropriate use criteria; AUC; carcinoma of the cervix; cervical cancer; pretreatment evaluation; response assessment; staging; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; RESPONSE EVALUATION; PET-CT; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; TUMOR DELINEATION; PREDICT SURVIVAL; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; F-18-FDG PET/CT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacr.2024.02.026
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Cervical cancer is a common gynecological malignancy worldwide. Cervical cancer is staged based on the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification system, which was revised in 2018 to incorporate radiologic and pathologic data. Imaging plays an important role in pretreatment assessment including initial staging and treatment response assessment of cervical cancer. Accurate determination of tumor size, local extension, and nodal and distant metastases is important for treatment selection and for prognostication. Although local recurrence can be diagnosed by physical examination, imaging plays a critical role in detection and follow-up of local and distant recurrence and subsequent treatment selection. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
引用
收藏
页码:S249 / S267
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ACR Appropriateness Criteria\Pretreatment Evaluation and Follow-Up of Endometrial Cancer
    Lalwani, Neeraj
    Dubinsky, Theodore
    Javitt, Marcia C.
    Gaffney, David K.
    Glanc, Phyllis
    Elshaikh, Mohamed A.
    Kim, Young Bae
    Lee, Larissa J.
    Pannu, Harpreet K.
    Royal, Henry D.
    Shipp, Thomas D.
    Siegel, Cary Lynn
    Simpson, Lynn
    Wahl, Andrew O.
    Wolfson, Aaron H.
    Zelop, Carolyn M.
    ULTRASOUND QUARTERLY, 2014, 30 (01) : 21 - 28
  • [2] ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pretreatment Planning of Invasive Cancer of the Cervix
    Siegel, Cary Lynn
    Andreotti, Rochelle F.
    Cardenes, Higinia Rosa
    Brown, Douglas L.
    Gaffney, David K.
    Horowitz, Neil S.
    Javitt, Marcia C.
    Lee, Susanna I.
    Mitchell, Donald G.
    Moore, David H.
    Rao, Gautam G.
    Royal, Henry D.
    Small, William, Jr.
    Varia, Mahesh A.
    Yashar, Catheryn M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 9 (06) : 395 - 402
  • [3] ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Staging and Follow-up of Primary Vaginal Cancer
    Kilcoyne, Aoife
    Gottumukkala, Ravi, V
    Kang, Stella K.
    Akin, Esma A.
    Hauck, Carlin
    Hindman, Nicole M.
    Huang, Chenchan
    Khanna, Namita
    Paspulati, Rajmohan
    Rauch, Gaiane M.
    Said, Tamer
    Shinagare, Atul B.
    Stein, Erica B.
    Venkatesan, Aradhana M.
    Maturen, Katherine E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 18 (11S) : S442 - S455
  • [4] ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Staging and Follow-Up of Esophageal Cancer
    Raptis, Constantine A.
    Goldstein, Alan
    Henry, Travis S.
    Porter, Kristin K.
    Catenacci, Daniel
    Kelly, Aine Marie
    Kuzniewski, Christopher T.
    Lai, Andrew R.
    Lee, Elizabeth
    Long, Jason M.
    Martin, Maria D.
    Morris, Michael F.
    Sandler, Kim L.
    Sirajuddin, Arlene
    Surasi, Devaki Shilpa
    Wallace, Graham W.
    Kamel, Ihab R.
    Donnelly, Edwin F.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 19 (11) : S462 - S472
  • [5] ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Staging and Follow-up of Vulvar Cancer
    Lakhman, Yulia
    Vargas, Hebert Alberto
    Reinhold, Caroline
    Akin, Esma A.
    Bhosale, Priyadarshani R.
    Huang, Chenchan
    Kang, Stella K.
    Khanna, Namita
    Kilcoyne, Aoife
    Nicola, Refky
    Paspulati, Rajmohan
    Rauch, Gaiane M.
    Shinagare, Atul B.
    Small, William, Jr.
    Glanc, Phyllis
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 18 (05) : S212 - S228
  • [6] ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pretreatment Evaluation and Follow-Up of Endometrial Cancer of the Uterus
    Lee, Jean Hwa
    Dubinsky, Theodore
    Andreotti, Rochelle F.
    Cardenes, Higinia Rosa
    Allison, Sandra O. DeJesus
    Gaffney, David K.
    Glanc, Phyllis
    Horowitz, Neil S.
    Jhingran, Anuja
    Lee, Susanna I.
    Puthawala, Ajmel A.
    Royal, Henry D.
    Scoutt, Leslie M.
    Small, William, Jr.
    Varia, Mahesh A.
    Zelop, Carolyn M.
    ULTRASOUND QUARTERLY, 2011, 27 (02) : 139 - 145
  • [7] ACR Appropriateness Criteria Staging and Follow-up of Ovarian Cancer
    Mitchell, Donald G.
    Javitt, Marcia C.
    Glanc, Phyllis
    Bennett, Genevieve L.
    Brown, Douglas L.
    Dubinsky, Theodore
    Harisinghani, Mukesh G.
    Harris, Robert D.
    Horowitz, Neil S.
    Pandharipande, Pari V.
    Pannu, Harpreet K.
    Podrasky, Ann E.
    Royal, Henry D.
    Shipp, Thomas D.
    Siegel, Cary Lynn
    Simpson, Lynn
    Wong-You-Cheong, Jade J.
    Zelop, Carolyn M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 10 (11) : 822 - 827
  • [8] ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Post-Treatment Follow-up of Prostate Cancer: 2022 Update
    Turkbey, Baris
    Oto, Aytekin
    Allen, Brian C.
    Akin, Oguz
    Alexander, Lauren F.
    Ari, Mim
    Froemming, Adam T.
    Fulgham, Pat F.
    Gettle, Lori Mankowski
    Maranchie, Jodi K.
    Rosenthal, Seth A.
    Schieda, Nicola
    Schuster, David M.
    Venkatesan, Aradhana M.
    Lockhart, Mark E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 20 (05) : S164 - S186
  • [9] ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pretreatment Staging of Urothelial Cancer: 2024 Update
    Barker, Samantha J.
    Soylu, Esra
    Allen, Brian C.
    Auron, Moises
    Costa, Daniel N.
    Gerena, Marielia
    Lotan, Yair
    Rose, Tracy L.
    Solanki, Abhishek
    Surasi, Devaki Shilpa
    Turkbey, Saris
    Whitworth, Pat, III
    Oto, Aytekin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 21 (11) : S464 - S489
  • [10] ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Posttreatment Follow-up of Prostate Cancer
    Casalino, David D.
    Remer, Erick M.
    Arellano, Ronald S.
    Bishoff, Jay T.
    Coursey, Courtney A.
    Dighe, Manjiri
    Eggli, Douglas F.
    Fulgham, Pat
    Israel, Gary M.
    Lazarus, Elizabeth
    Leyendecker, John R.
    Nikolaidis, Paul
    Papanicolaou, Nicholas
    Prasad, Srinivasa
    Ramchandani, Parvati
    Sheth, Sheila
    Vikram, Raghunandan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 8 (12) : 863 - 871