Projected changes to Arctic shipping routes after stratospheric aerosol deployment in the ARISE-SAI scenarios

被引:1
作者
Morrison, Ariel L. [1 ]
Pathak, Debanjali [2 ]
Barnes, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
Hurrell, James W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Atmospher Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Grinnell Coll, Phys Dept, Grinnell, IA USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE | 2024年 / 6卷
关键词
sea ice; climate intervention; climate change; shipping; stratospheric aerosol injection; Arctic; NORTHERN SEA ROUTE; ICE; PERSPECTIVES; NAVIGABILITY; VARIABILITY; IMPACTS; MODELS;
D O I
10.3389/fclim.2024.1426679
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Introduction Rapid reductions in Arctic sea ice in response to warming have led to increased interest in using the Arctic Ocean for commercial shipping. As the world warms, however, different strategies are being considered to stabilize or reduce surface temperatures in order to prevent critical climate change impacts. One such strategy is stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), a form of solar climate intervention. Projected changes to Arctic sea ice under SAI with specific regards to shipping have not yet been assessed.Methods We compare output from two SAI simulations that have different global mean temperature targets with a non-SAI control simulation to provide the first assessment of Arctic Ocean navigability under potential SAI scenarios.Results We find that sea ice concentration and thickness quickly stabilize or increase after SAI deployment. When sea ice thickness stabilizes in response to SAI, the number of days when the Arctic Ocean is navigable remains fairly constant, but increasing sea ice thickness leads to reduced navigability compared to the non-SAI simulation. From 2035-2069, both the Northwest Passage and Northern Sea Route are accessible from July-November in all three simulations, but there are no navigable routes under either SAI scenario from April-June. When the Arctic is navigable, it can take 2-12 days longer to cross the Arctic Ocean in the SAI simulations than in the non-SAI control simulation, and there are large year-to-year variations in travel time.Discussion Overall, Arctic shipping may take longer and be more difficult in an SAI vs a non-SAI world because of relatively thicker sea ice, but the degree to which Arctic shipping may change in response to SAI is dependent on the particular climate intervention strategy.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] On the future navigability of Arctic sea routes: High-resolution projections of the Arctic Ocean and sea ice
    Aksenov, Yevgeny
    Popova, Ekaterina E.
    Yool, Andrew
    Nurser, A. J. George
    Williams, Timothy D.
    Bertino, Laurent
    Bergh, Jon
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2017, 75 : 300 - 317
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2021, Reflecting sunlight: Recommendations for solar geoengineering research and research governance
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, GUIDELINES SHIPS OPE
  • [4] Melting ice, growing trade?
    Bensassi, Sami
    Stroeve, Julienne C.
    Martinez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada
    Barrett, Andrew P.
    [J]. ELEMENTA-SCIENCE OF THE ANTHROPOCENE, 2016, 4 : 1 - 11
  • [5] Arctic cryosphere response in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project G3 and G4 scenarios
    Berdahl, Mira
    Robock, Alan
    Ji, Duoying
    Moore, John C.
    Jones, Andy
    Kravitz, Ben
    Watanabe, Shingo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2014, 119 (03) : 1308 - 1321
  • [6] Sea Ice Retreat Contributes to Projected Increases in Extreme Arctic Ocean Surface Waves
    Casas-Prat, Merce
    Wang, Xiaolan L.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 47 (15)
  • [7] Perspectives on future sea ice and navigability in the Arctic
    Chen, Jinlei
    Kang, Shichang
    Du, Wentao
    Guo, Junming
    Xu, Min
    Zhang, Yulan
    Zhong, Xinyue
    Zhang, Wei
    Chen, Jizu
    [J]. CRYOSPHERE, 2021, 15 (12) : 5473 - 5482
  • [8] Changes in shipping navigability in the Canadian Arctic between 1972 and 2016
    Copland, Luke
    Dawson, Jackie
    Tivy, Adrienne
    Delaney, Frances
    Cook, Alison
    [J]. FACETS, 2021, 6 : 1069 - 1087
  • [9] The Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2)
    Danabasoglu, G.
    Lamarque, J. -F.
    Bacmeister, J.
    Bailey, D. A.
    DuVivier, A. K.
    Edwards, J.
    Emmons, L. K.
    Fasullo, J.
    Garcia, R.
    Gettelman, A.
    Hannay, C.
    Holland, M. M.
    Large, W. G.
    Lauritzen, P. H.
    Lawrence, D. M.
    Lenaerts, J. T. M.
    Lindsay, K.
    Lipscomb, W. H.
    Mills, M. J.
    Neale, R.
    Oleson, K. W.
    Otto-Bliesner, B.
    Phillips, A. S.
    Sacks, W.
    Tilmes, S.
    Van Kampenhout, L.
    Vertenstein, M.
    Bertini, A.
    Dennis, J.
    Deser, C.
    Fischer, C.
    Fox-Kemper, B.
    Kay, J. E.
    Kinnison, D.
    Kushner, P. J.
    Larson, V. E.
    Long, M. C.
    Mickelson, S.
    Moore, J. K.
    Nienhouse, E.
    Polvani, L.
    Rasch, P. J.
    Strand, W. G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2020, 12 (02)
  • [10] The CCSM4 Ocean Component
    Danabasoglu, Gokhan
    Bates, Susan C.
    Briegleb, Bruce P.
    Jayne, Steven R.
    Jochum, Markus
    Large, William G.
    Peacock, Synte
    Yeager, Steve G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2012, 25 (05) : 1361 - 1389