Examiner Performance Influenced by Core Self-Evaluation: Examining the Moderating Role of Information Technology

被引:0
作者
Rabiyah, Ulfa [1 ]
Hanafi, Kartini [1 ]
Kusumawati, Andi [1 ]
Indrijawati, Aini [1 ]
机构
[1] Hasanuddin Univ, Dept Accounting, Makassar, Indonesia
来源
INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES | 2024年 / 17卷 / 04期
关键词
locus of control; emotional stability; self-esteem; self-efficacy; Information Technology; ACCEPTANCE; EFFICACY; LOCUS;
D O I
10.22059/ijms.2024.361620.675992
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This study aims to understand the role of core self-evaluation in examiner performance, as well as provide an illustration of how information technology moderates the effect of core self-evaluation on examiner performance. This study seeks to fill the lack of empirical evidence about the role of personality models; personality models are needed to improve individual performance. The conceptual framework model is developed using attribution theory and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) model as the grand theory. Two hundred sixty-five questionnaires were distributed to tax examiners in five provinces on the island of Sulawesi; the data were collected using Google Forms. In the hypothesis analysis, the researcher uses SEM-Amos to describe the effect of the independent variables on the dependent variable. The results of this study indicate that locus of control, emotional stability, self-esteem, and self-efficacy influence the examiner performance. Likewise, information technology can moderate the effect of locus of control, emotional stability, self-esteem, and self-efficacy on examiner performance. Presumably, the findings of this study can be used by tax service offices to improve the performance of their examiner by utilizing information technology to meet budget realization targets. Academics, too, can support new knowledge as well as theory development.
引用
收藏
页码:1125 / 1140
页数:16
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Agustina T, 2022, Jurnal Economia, V18, P1, DOI [10.21831/economia.v18i1.34013, 10.21831/economia.v18i1.34013, DOI 10.21831/ECONOMIA.V18I1.34013]
[2]  
Amadu L, 2018, Journal of Technology and Science Education, V8, P321, DOI [10.3926/jotse.383, 10.3926/jotse.383, DOI 10.3926/JOTSE.383]
[3]  
Andryani I., 2021, Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan, V14, P59
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Revenue Statistics in Asia and the Pacific 2022
[5]  
Ardanti D. M., 2017, Journal of Management, V6, P1
[6]   Locus of control, self-efficacy, and the mediating effect of outcome control: predicting course-level and global outcomes in an academic context [J].
Au, Evelyn W. M. .
ANXIETY STRESS AND COPING, 2015, 28 (04) :425-444
[7]  
Brown J.D., 2014, PSYCHOL PERSPECTIVES, V4, P27, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315806976-8
[8]  
Budiman S. P., 2016, Pengaruh Struktur Audit, Locus Of Control
[9]   Core Self-Evaluations: A Review and Evaluation of the Literature [J].
Chang, Chu-Hsiang ;
Ferris, D. Lance ;
Johnson, Russell E. ;
Rosen, Christopher C. ;
Tan, James A. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2012, 38 (01) :81-128