BACK TO THE FUTURE: MERGER CONTROL OUTSIDE THE MERGER REGULATION

被引:0
作者
Volcker, Sven B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Gottingen Univ, Gottingen, Germany
来源
COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW | 2024年 / 61卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
In 1989, the Council gave the European Commission a clear and limited legislative mandate for the control of concentrations, stipulating, among other things, that (i) the Commission's competence must be limited to large transactions based on clearly defined turnover thresholds; (ii) the EU Merger Regulation alone should apply to concentrations; and (iii)concentrations must be reviewed within tight statutory deadlines. Since its first proposal in 1973, the Commission has been seeking lower turnover thresholds and broader powers, which the Council has consistently refused. Yet the Commission has reinterpreted Article 22 of the EU Merger Regulation to effectively give it the power to "call in" concentrations below the thresholds, advocated for Member States' ability to apply the EU antitrust rules to concentrations, and developed procedural tools and practices (including the concept of "up-front buyer" commitments) that allow it to ignore the strict statutory time limits in practice. It is time for a reset to align the Commission's practice with its legislative mandate
引用
收藏
页码:1223 / 1254
页数:32
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, EU's merger-regime review honing in on thresholds, official says
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Case T-119/02, Royal Philips Electronics NV v. Commission
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Case C-116/20, Avio Lucos
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1988, COM(88)87 final, P4
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Kesko v. Commission
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2001, COM2001745
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Case T-584/19, ThyssenKrupp
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Germany, 10th Amendment to the Act against Restraints of Competition
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Case C-170/02 P, Schlusselverlag Moser
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Case T-227/21, Illumina v. Commission