Teaching and learning about the Holocaust: a systematic scoping review of existing research

被引:3
作者
Pistone, Isabella [1 ]
Andersson, Lars M. [2 ]
Lidstrom, Allan [1 ]
Nelhans, Gustaf [3 ]
Pernler, Tobias [4 ]
Sivenbring, Jennie [5 ]
Sager, Morten [1 ]
Mattson, Christer [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Philosophy Linguist & Theory Sci, S-41255 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Uppsala Univ, Dept Hist, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Univ Boras, Swedish Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Boras, Sweden
[4] Univ Gothenburg, Gothenburg Univ Lib, Biomed Lib, Gothenburg, Sweden
[5] Univ Gothenburg, Segerstedt Inst, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Education; pedagogy; teaching and learning about the Holocaust; Holocaust education; scoping review; SELF-REGULATION; METACOGNITION;
D O I
10.1080/17504902.2023.2245282
中图分类号
K [历史、地理];
学科分类号
06 ;
摘要
This scoping review aims to map and summarize practice-based research that evaluates outcomes in teaching and learning about the Holocaust (TLH). It focuses on providing an overview of the characteristics of existing literature and synthesizing the educational interventions' effects evaluated in previous studies. Nineteen bibliographical databases were searched for relevant empirical research published from 1945 to 2020 worldwide. After screening and relevance assessment, 117 research publications were identified for inclusion in the review. The included material was analysed by bibliometric analysis, thematic analysis of educational approaches, and narrative synthesis of outcomes. Based on the bibliometric analysis, the findings suggest that practice-based research on TLH's educational outcomes is a neglected subfield within the academic field of TLH, with a lack of cumulative development across studies. The scoping review also showed a dominance of studies conducted with qualitative study designs. The narrative synthesis of outcomes showed that these studies provide important insights into how interventions within TLH impact students; nonetheless, these studies need to be supplemented with knowledge from quantitative studies. Without such knowledge, we have a knowledge gap that could imply that TLH interventions are implemented arbitrarily, that students do not learn the intended lessons, or that the lessons are not lasting.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 21
页数:21
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Allwork L., 2019, History & Policy
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Purposeful Program Theory: Effective Use of Theories of Change and Logic Models
[3]  
Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616, 10.1080/136455703200019616, 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
[4]  
Bromley P., 2010, Prospects, V40, P153, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-010-9139-5, DOI 10.1007/S11125-010-9139-5]
[5]  
Cowan P., 2005, Scottish Educational Review, V37, P104, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X211069432, DOI 10.1177/0193841X211069432]
[6]   Does addressing prejudice and discrimination through Holocaust education produce better citizens? [J].
Cowan, Paula ;
Maitles, Henry .
EDUCATIONAL REVIEW, 2007, 59 (02) :115-130
[7]   'We saw inhumanity close up'. What is gained by school students from Scotland visiting Auschwitz? [J].
Cowan, Paula ;
Maitles, Henry .
JOURNAL OF CURRICULUM STUDIES, 2011, 43 (02) :163-184
[8]   Holocaust education: global forces shaping curricula integration and implementation [J].
Davis, Bryan L. ;
Rubinstein-Avila, Eliane .
INTERCULTURAL EDUCATION, 2013, 24 (1-2) :149-166
[9]   Focusing the Conceptual Lens on Metacognition, Self-regulation, and Self-regulated Learning [J].
Dinsmore, Daniel L. ;
Alexander, Patricia A. ;
Loughlin, Sandra M. .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2008, 20 (04) :391-409
[10]  
Dixon-Woods Mary, 2005, J Health Serv Res Policy, V10, P45, DOI 10.1258/1355819052801804