Integrated Use of Furnace Bottom Ash as Fine Aggregate and Cement Replacement for Sustainable Mortar Production

被引:1
作者
Tang, Waiching [1 ]
Onaizi, Ali M. [1 ]
Onaizi, Sagheer A. [2 ,3 ]
Sajjad, Umer [1 ]
Liu, Yanju [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, Univ Dr, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
[2] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Dept Chem Engn, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Hydrogen Technol & Carbo, Dhahran 31216, Saudi Arabia
[4] Univ Newcastle, Global Ctr Environm Remediat, Univ Dr, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
关键词
furnace bottom ash; cement replacement; fine aggregate replacement; mechanical properties; environmental impact; PORTLAND-CEMENT; FLY-ASH; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; CONCRETE; STRENGTH; PERFORMANCE; COMBUSTION; HYDRATION; DURABILITY; HYDROXIDE;
D O I
10.3390/ma17153834
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Recycling fly ash (FA) and furnace bottom ash (FBA) help with reducing greenhouse gas emissions, conserving natural resources, and minimizing waste accumulation. However, research on recycling FBA is progressing more slowly compared to FA. This research aims to investigate the combined use of FBA as a replacement for both fine aggregate and cement and its influence on the performance of mortar. The findings indicated that incorporating 25% FBA as a fine aggregate replacement and 10% or 20% ground FBA (GFBA) as a cement replacement significantly enhanced compressive strength after 28 and 56 days. Flexural strength was comparable to control mortar at 28 days and superior at 56 days. However, increasing the FBA content beyond 25% as a fine aggregate replacement reduced workability and increased porosity, which negatively affected mechanical performance and water absorption. Microstructural analyses revealed denser and more compact structures in the mortar with combined FBA replacement for both fine aggregate and cement, specifically 25% as a fine aggregate replacement and 10% and 20% as cement replacements. Optimal performance was noted in mixtures with Ca/Si and Ca/Al ratios within the ranges of 1.8-1.5 and 0.24-0.19, respectively. Trace element leaching analysis has not shown significant differences between GFBA, FA, and OPC. Regarding environmental impact assessment, using FBA as a fine aggregate replacement did not show a significant reduction in CO2 emissions, but replacing cement with FBA reduced emissions remarkably. Generally, using FBA as a replacement for both fine aggregate and cement in mortar enhances compressive and flexural strengths at optimal levels, promotes sustainability by reducing landfill waste and CO2 emissions, and supports cleaner production practices despite some workability challenges.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 101 条
  • [1] Recycling Untreated Coal Bottom Ash with Added Value for Mitigating Alkali-Silica Reaction in Concrete: A Sustainable Approach
    Abbas, Safeer
    Arshad, Uzair
    Abbass, Wasim
    Nehdi, Moncef L.
    Ahmed, Ali
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (24) : 1 - 24
  • [2] Abdullah M. H., 2019, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, V527, DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/527/1/012006
  • [3] An investigation of bottom ash as a pozzolanic material
    Abdulmatin, Akkadath
    Tangchirapat, Weerachart
    Jaturapitakkul, Chai
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2018, 186 : 155 - 162
  • [4] Al-Naqkeeb A.S., 2020, Relationship between Mix Design, Concrete Performance and Carbon Footprint
  • [5] Investigation on Mechanical and Durability Properties of Concrete Mixed with Silica Fume as Cementitious Material and Coal Bottom Ash as Fine Aggregate Replacement Material
    Ali, Tariq
    Buller, Abdul Salam
    Abro, Fahad ul Rehman
    Ahmed, Zaheer
    Shabbir, Samreen
    Lashari, Ali Raza
    Hussain, Ghulam
    [J]. BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [6] Performance of cement mortars and concretes containing coal bottom ash: A comprehensive review
    Ankur, Nitin
    Singh, Navdeep
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 149
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2017, BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2017
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2006, AS/NZS 2350.11:2006
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2000, 114142000 AS
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2014, Aggregates and Rock for Engineering Purposes-Concrete Aggregates