Comparison between mono vs dual vs triple antiplatelet therapy in patients with ischemic heart disease undergoing PCI, a network meta-analysis

Aims: We aim to research the efficacy and safety of single(SAPT), dual(DAPT), and triple(TAPT) antiplatelets approaches across IHD patients undergoing PCI. Methods and results: A network meta-analysis was conducted until April 1st, 2024, using the netmeta package in R studio 4.3.3. Primary outcomes were cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis, stroke, and major bleeding(BARC 3-5). From 25 studies, a total of 65115 patients were included. For cardiac death, TAPT had no different risk than DAPT compared to SAPT [RR = 0.74; 95%CI (0.40 to 1.35); p-value = 0.33], [RR = 1.01, 95%CI (0.84 to 1.19); p-value = 0.87] respectively. For MI, TAPT had no different risk than DAPT compared to SAPT [RR = 0.77; 95%CI (0.51 to 1.16); p-value = 0.2047], [RR = 0.81, 95%CI (0.64 to 1.03); p-value = 0.0850] respectively. For stent thrombosis, DAPT had no different risk than TAPT compared to SAPT [RR = 0.74; 95%CI (0.45 to 1.21); p-value = 0.2284], [RR = 0.84, 95%CI (0.27 to 2.59); p-value = 0.7630] respectively. For stroke, DAPT had no different risk than TAPT in comparison to SAPT [RR = 0.91; 95%CI (0.75 to 1.10); p-value = 0.3209], and [RR = 0.87, 95%CI (0.43 to 1.76); p-value=0.6937], respectively. For Major bleeding(BARC 3-5), DAPT and TAPT increased major bleeding compared to SAPT, with only DAPT showing statistical significance. [RR = 1.43; 95%CI (1.09 to 1.88); p-value = 0.0107], and [RR = 2.78, 95%CI (0.90 to 4.78); p-value = 0.0852], respectively.