Influence of Crown Height and Width on Marginal Bone Loss and Long-Term Stability of Dental Implants: A Systematic Review

被引:2
作者
Jain, Ritul [1 ]
Pisulkar, Sweta G. [1 ]
Dubey, Surekha A. [1 ]
Bansod, Akansha [1 ]
Beri, Arushi [1 ]
Deshmukh, Shruti [1 ]
机构
[1] Datta Meghe Inst Higher Educ & Res, Sharad Pawar Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Prosthodont & Crown & Bridge, Wardha, India
关键词
bone density; short implants; implant stability; crown-implant ratio; dental implants; marginal bone loss; crown width; crown height; RESONANCE FREQUENCY-ANALYSIS; COMPLICATION RATES; INSERTION TORQUE; SURVIVAL; RATIO;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.65109
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Still, a major focus of research in implantology is how crown height and width affect marginal bone loss (MBL) and the long-term durability of dental implants. Maximizing the success of implants and lowering problems depends on an awareness of these elements. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, this systematic review searched pertinent studies across several databases using keywords unique to databases. Studies on MBL and long-term implant stability evaluated in the review included those on crown height and width, horizontal and vertical cantilevers, and prosthesis dimensions. In the chosen studies, we found that both implant success and crestal bone loss were greatly influenced by crown height and width. Particularly in the posterior sections, horizontal cantilevers were connected to both increasing MBL and mechanical problems. Vertical cantilevers also affected MBL; however, their impacts were more obvious in circumstances with greater crown heights. Greater prosthesis widths, especially in the mandibular molar area, were linked to higher MBL. Bone density and insertion torque (IT) were the main determinants of MBL, more than the primary implant stability quotient. Early MBL was influenced by abutment height, mucosal thickness, and implant insertion depth; bone levels stabilized six months later. Short implants allow single crowns to be supported, but in some cases, a higher failure rate was seen. The success and stability of dental implants were found to be mostly dependent on crown height, width, and cantilever design. MBL and long-term stability are greatly influenced by horizontal and vertical cantilevers, which calls for careful design and planning. With specific care for bone density, IT, and early MBL stabilization, both short and standard implants can produce equivalent results. These results highlight the need for customized treatment plans to maximize implant success and lifetime.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[31]  
Rangert B, 1995, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V10, P326
[32]   Use of short implants (6mm) in a single-tooth replacement: a 5-year follow-up prospective randomized controlled multicenter clinical study [J].
Rossi, Fabio ;
Botticelli, Daniele ;
Cesaretti, Gianfranco ;
De Santis, Enzo ;
Storelli, Stefano ;
Lang, Niklaus P. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (04) :458-464
[33]   The proportion of cancellous bone as predictive factor for early marginal bone loss around implants in the posterior part of the mandible [J].
Simons, Willem-Frederik ;
De Smit, Menke ;
Duyck, Joke ;
Coucke, Wim ;
Quirynen, Marc .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 (09) :1051-1059
[34]   Assessment of the Effect of Bone Density on Implant Stability: A Clinical Study [J].
Sreerama, Raghunadh ;
Kolluru, Krishna Chaitanya ;
Gottumukkala, Vineela ;
Innampudi, Chaitanya Kumar ;
Konathala, Jagga Rao ;
Krishnaveni, G. .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2021, 13 (05) :297-300
[35]   Changes in implant stability using different site preparation techniques: Osseodensification drills versus piezoelectric surgery. A multi-center prospective randomized controlled clinical trial [J].
Stacchi, Claudio ;
Troiano, Giuseppe ;
Montaruli, Graziano ;
Mozzati, Marco ;
Lamazza, Luca ;
Antonelli, Alessandro ;
Giudice, Amerigo ;
Lombardi, Teresa .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2023, 25 (01) :133-140
[36]   ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions [J].
Sterne, Jonathan A. C. ;
Hernan, Miguel A. ;
Reeves, Barnaby C. ;
Savovic, Jelena ;
Berkman, Nancy D. ;
Viswanathan, Meera ;
Henry, David ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Ansari, Mohammed T. ;
Boutron, Isabelle ;
Carpenter, James R. ;
Chan, An-Wen ;
Churchill, Rachel ;
Deeks, Jonathan J. ;
Hrobjartsson, Asbjorn ;
Kirkham, Jamie ;
Juni, Peter ;
Loke, Yoon K. ;
Pigott, Theresa D. ;
Ramsay, Craig R. ;
Regidor, Deborah ;
Rothstein, Hannah R. ;
Sandhu, Lakhbir ;
Santaguida, Pasqualina L. ;
Schunemann, Holger J. ;
Shea, Beverly ;
Shrier, Ian ;
Tugwell, Peter ;
Turner, Lucy ;
Valentine, Jeffrey C. ;
Waddington, Hugh ;
Waters, Elizabeth ;
Wells, George A. ;
Whiting, Penny F. ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 355
[37]   Impact of crown-to-implant ratio of marginal bone loss around implant-supported single crowns. A 5 years retrospective study [J].
Stoichkov, B. ;
Kirov, D. .
JOURNAL OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, 2020, 12 (04) :706-710
[38]   Resonance Frequency Analysis to Evaluate the Effect of Different Drilling Techniques on Implant Stability at Different Time Intervals: A Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Sunny, Greeshma ;
Mishra, Sunil K. ;
Chowdhary, Ramesh .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2022, 37 (05) :1055-+
[39]  
Tawil G, 2006, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V21, P275
[40]   Survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed partial dentures with cantilevers: a systematic review [J].
Zurdo, Jose ;
Romao, Cristina ;
Wennstrom, Jan L. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 :59-66