Analyzing environmental communication and citizen science in the context of environmental monitoring and assessment for Agenda 2030 in rural settings of Chile and Sweden

被引:1
作者
Alarcon-Ferrari, Cristian [1 ]
Jonsson, Mari [2 ]
Do, Thao [3 ]
Gebrehiwot, Solomon Gebreyohannis [4 ]
Chiwona-Karltun, Linley [1 ]
Mark-Herbert, Cecilia [5 ]
Powell, Neil [3 ,6 ]
Ruete, Alejandro [7 ]
Hilding-Rydevik, Tuija [8 ]
Bishop, Kevin [9 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Dept Urban & Rural Dev, Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Swedish Species Informat Ctr, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Sustainabil Learning & Res Ctr SWEDESD, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Addis Ababa Univ, Ethiopian Inst Water Resources, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
[5] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Dept Forest Econ, Uppsala, Sweden
[6] Univ Sunshine Coast USC, Sustainabil Res Ctr, Sippy Downs, Qld, Australia
[7] Greensway AB, Uppsala, Sweden
[8] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Swedish Biodivers Ctr, Uppsala, Sweden
[9] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Dept Aquat Sci & Assessment, Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
legitimacy; agenda; 2030; citizen science; democratic innovation; environmental monitoring and assessment; sustainable development goal 15 (Life on Land); tree plantations; forests; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; DECISION-MAKING; POLICY; PARTICIPATION; FORESTRY; POWER;
D O I
10.3389/fcomm.2024.1387111
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Introduction This article offers an analysis of environmental communication (EC) and citizen science (CS) in the context of Environmental Monitoring and Assessment (EMA) for the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 15 (Life on Land) in Chile and Sweden.Methods The paper is based on fieldwork in two rural study areas of Chile and Sweden where we followed different CS initiatives in relation to EMA and Agenda 2030. We conducted interviews, analyzed documentation and conducted an SDG mapping workshop to understand the implementation of SDG 15 in these two rural forest settings.Results Our findings suggest that CS has potential as a democratic innovation for environmental governance in both countries. However, we also found important barriers to the legitimacy of CS as a feature of EMA and local environmental governance in both countries. The paper situates CS in the wider governance and environmental communication processes in regional politics surrounding implementation of national policies for the use of natural resources.Discussion The article offers new insights into the barriers and possibilities for public participation in environmental governance and policy at local levels, by addressing the interlinkages between environmental communication and citizen science in rural settings.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 130 条
[81]  
Mittermeier R. A., 1999, Hotspots: Earth's biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions
[82]  
Moser SC, 2015, ROUT INT HANDB, P402
[83]  
Municipalidad de Cobquecura, 2014, Municipal Development Plan (Plan de Desarrollo Comunal/PLADECO) 2014-2019
[84]  
Municipalidad de San Fabian, 2016, Municipal Development Plan (Plan de Desarrollo Comunal/PLADECO) 2016-2017
[85]  
Municipalidad de San Nicolas, 2007, Municipal Development Plan Plan de Desarrollo Comunal/PLADECO 2008-2015
[86]  
Naturskyddsforeningen Nordanstig, 2024, Artskyddet i Sverige - rodlistning och fridlysning
[87]  
Naturvardsverket, 2009, Atgardsprogram for sotgras
[88]  
Naturvardsverket and lansstyrelserna, 2004, Skyddsvarda statliga skogar i mellersta Sverige
[89]  
Naturvardsverket and Skogsstyrelsen, 2017, Gemensamma tolkning av bombmurkledomens konsekvenser for artskyddet
[90]  
Nilsson M., 2017, Working paper 2017-06