Comparative techno-economic and environmental analysis of a relocatable solar power tower for low to medium temperature industrial process heat supply

被引:3
作者
Gamil, Ahmed [1 ]
Li, Peiwen [1 ]
Khammash, Abdel Latif [2 ]
Ali, Babkir [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Aerosp & Mech Engn, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] SUNY Binghamton, Dept Syst Sci & Ind Engn, Binghamton, NY 13850 USA
[3] Univ Doha Sci & Technol, Jelaiah St,POB 24449, Duhail North, Qatar
关键词
Industrial process heat; Solar power tower; Techno-economic analysis; Environmental analysis; PARABOLIC TROUGH; LINEAR FRESNEL; TECHNOLOGIES; ELECTRICITY; SYSTEMS; CLIMATE; DESIGN; PLANT; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2024.132085
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The primary objective of this study is to promote the adoption of solar power tower (SPT) technology in low to medium-temperature industrial process heat (IPH) applications and compare it with other heat generation alternatives. Through comprehensive techno-economic and environmental analyses, a proposed relocatable SPTbased IPH plant (PR-SPT-IPH), with a capacity of 1 MW th , is thoroughly evaluated against traditional concentrating solar-thermal power (CSP) technologies like parabolic trough collectors (PTC) and linear Fresnel reflectors (LFR), as well as natural gas (NG) and photovoltaic (PV) -based IPH systems. The techno-economic assessment of the PR-SPT-IPH is performed using an in-house developed MATLAB code, while the system advisor model (SAM) is used to simulate equivalent PTC-, LFR-, and PV -based IPH plants. The primary techno-economic assessment metric is the levelized cost of heat (LCOH), while the environmental analysis quantifies the avoided greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and other pollutants resulting from NG combustion. The results show that the PR-SPT-IPH plant achieves the lowest LCOH of 2.42 cents/kWh th , generating annual thermal energy of 5.62 GWh th with a capacity factor of 48.27 %. With certain assumptions, this cost can be further reduced to 1.5 cents/ kWh th , meeting the U.S. Department of Energy targets. The PR-SPT-IPH plant could annually avoid emitting 1112 kg of CO 2 , 54 kg of particulate matter, 1201.76 kg of NOx, and 5.08 kg of SO 2 . It could also save annual external costs between $43,100.28 and $153,194.67, while the annually saved fuel cost could reach $151,632. The study indicates that the PR-SPT-IPH plant surpasses PTC-, LFR-, NG-, and PV -based IPH plants both technically and financially. With reduced capital costs and appropriate incentives, the PR-SPT-IPH plant emerges as an economically and environmentally viable choice for low to medium-temperature IPH applications.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 59 条
[41]   Simulation and experimental validation of a parabolic trough plant for solar thermal applications under the semi-arid climate conditions [J].
Mouaky, Ammar ;
Alami Merrouni, Ahmed ;
Eddine Laadel, Nour ;
Bennouna, El Ghali .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2019, 194 :969-985
[42]   CO2 emission reduction in the cement industry by using a solar calciner [J].
Moumin, Gkiokchan ;
Ryssel, Maximilian ;
Zhao, Li ;
Markewitz, Peter ;
Sattler, Christian ;
Robinius, Martin ;
Stolten, Detlef .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 145 (145) :1578-1596
[43]  
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, System Advisor ModelTM Version 2023.12.17
[44]  
Payback Solar, 2017, Industrial solar heat pays off Online
[45]  
Philibert C., 2017, Renewable Energy for Industry: From Green Energy to Green Materials and Fuels
[46]   Design and thermal performance analysis of concentrating solar power tower for water heating systems [J].
Qenawy, Mohamed ;
El-Mesery, Hany S. ;
Wang, Junfeng ;
Abdelhady, Salama .
CASE STUDIES IN THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 48
[47]   Techno-economic analysis of hybrid PV/T systems for process heat using electricity to subsidize the cost of heat [J].
Riggs, Brian C. ;
Biedenharn, Richard ;
Dougher, Christopher ;
Ji, Yaping Vera ;
Xu, Qi ;
Romanin, Vince ;
Codd, Daniel S. ;
Zahler, James M. ;
Escarra, Matthew D. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 208 :1370-1378
[48]   Solar for industrial process heat: A review of technologies, analysis approaches, and potential applications in the United States [J].
Schoeneberger, Carrie A. ;
McMillan, Colin A. ;
Kurup, Parthiv ;
Akar, Sertac ;
Margolis, Robert ;
Masanet, Eric .
ENERGY, 2020, 206
[49]   Energy economic evaluation of process heat supply by solar tower and high temperature reactor based on the ammonia production process [J].
Schroeders, Sarah ;
Allelein, Hans-Josef .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 212 :622-639
[50]   The National Solar Radiation Data Base (NSRDB) [J].
Sengupta, Manajit ;
Xie, Yu ;
Lopez, Anthony ;
Habte, Aron ;
Maclaurin, Galen ;
Shelby, James .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 89 :51-60