Non-isothermal thermogravimetric kinetic analysis of the thermochemical conversion of human faeces

被引:12
作者
Fidalgo, B. [1 ]
Chilmeran, M. [1 ]
Somorin, T. [1 ]
Sowale, A. [1 ]
Kolios, A. [1 ]
Parker, A. [1 ]
Williams, L. [1 ]
Collins, M. [1 ]
McAdam, E. J. [1 ]
Tyrrel, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Sch Water Energy & Environm, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
Pyrolysis; Combustion; Thermogravimetric analysis; Kinetics; Human faeces; Nano membrane toilet; PAPER-MILL SLUDGE; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; PYROLYSIS CHARACTERISTICS; MODEL-FREE; COMBUSTION; COAL; COCOMBUSTION; BIOMASS; ENERGY; MANURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2018.08.090
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The "Reinvent the Toilet Challenge" set by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation aims to bring access to adequate sanitary systems to billions of people. In response to this challenge, on-site sanitation systems are proposed and being developed globally. These systems require in-situ thermal treatment, processes that are not well understood for human faeces (HF). Thermogravimetric analysis has been used to investigate the pyrolysis, gasification and combustion of HF. The results are compared to the thermal behaviour of simulant faeces (SF) and woody biomass (WB), along with the blends of HF and WB. Kinetic analysis was conducted using non-isothermal kinetics model-free methods, and the thermogravimetric data obtained for the combustion of HF, SS and WB. The results show that the devolatilisation of HF requires higher temperatures and rates are slower those of WB. Minimum temperatures of 475 K are required for fuel ignition. HF and SF showed similar thermal behaviour under pyrolysis, but not under combustion conditions. The activation energy for HF is 157.4 kJ/mol, relatively higher than SS and WB. Reaction order for HF is lower (n = 0.4) to WB (n = 0.6). In-situ treatment of HF in on-site sanitary systems can be designed for slow progressive burn. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1177 / 1184
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   A Non-isothermal Thermogravimetric Kinetic Analysis of Malaysian Sewage Sludge [J].
Abbas, A. H. ;
Aris, M. S. ;
Sulaiman, S. A. ;
Fadhil, M. .
ICPER 2014 - 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRODUCTION, ENERGY AND RELIABILITY, 2014, 13
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Progress on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene: 2017 update and SDGbaselines
[3]  
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, 2011, REINV TOIL CHALL
[4]   Processing thermogravimetric analysis data for isoconversional kinetic analysis of lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis: Case study of corn stalk [J].
Cai, Junmeng ;
Xu, Di ;
Dong, Zhujun ;
Yu, Xi ;
Yang, Yang ;
Banks, Scott W. ;
Bridgwater, Anthony V. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 82 :2705-2715
[5]   Pyrolysis characteristics of cattle manures using a discrete distributed activation energy model [J].
Cao, Hongliang ;
Xin, Ya ;
Wang, Dianlong ;
Yuan, Qiaoxia .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 172 :219-225
[6]   Comparison of kinetic analysis methods in thermal decomposition of cattle manure by themogravimetric analysis [J].
Chen, Guanyi ;
He, Sirong ;
Cheng, Zhanjun ;
Guan, Yanan ;
Yan, Beibei ;
Ma, Wenchao ;
Leung, Dennis Y. C. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 243 :69-77
[7]   Combustion and gasification rates of lignocellulosic chars [J].
Di Blasi, Colomba .
PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2009, 35 (02) :121-140
[8]   Thermogravimetric analysis of the co-combustion of coal and sewage sludge [J].
Folgueras, AB ;
Díaz, RM ;
Xiberta, J ;
Prieto, I .
FUEL, 2003, 82 (15-17) :2051-2055
[9]   Kinetic models for the pyrolysis and combustion of two types of sewage sludge [J].
Font, R ;
Fullana, A ;
Conesa, J .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL AND APPLIED PYROLYSIS, 2005, 74 (1-2) :429-438
[10]   Conceptual energy and water recovery system for self-sustained nano membrane toilet [J].
Hanak, Dawid P. ;
Kolios, Athanasios J. ;
Onabanjo, Tosin ;
Wagland, Stuart T. ;
Patchigolla, Kumar ;
Fidalgo, Beatriz ;
Manovic, Vasilije ;
McAdam, Ewan ;
Parker, Alison ;
Williams, Leon ;
Tyrrel, Sean ;
Cartmell, Elise .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 126 :352-361