A Decade of Online Physician-Rating Websites in Germany: an Assessment of the Current Level of Development

被引:4
作者
Emmert, Martin [1 ]
Meszmer, Nina [1 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Rechts & Wirtschaftswissensch Fak, Inst Management IFM, Lange Gasse 20, D-90403 Nurnberg, Germany
关键词
public reporting; transparency; physician-rating websites; internet; HOSPITAL QUALITY; SITES; AWARENESS; CARE;
D O I
10.1055/s-0043-114002
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective On physician-rating websites (PRW), patients have the opportunity to search for physicians and also evaluate their performance. PRW in Germany has been in existence for a decade; this study aims to provide an overview of the current level of their significance for both patients and the health care system. Methods (1) A systematic internet search was carried out to identify German PRW. (2) Online-derived cross-sectional data (N=1,044 respondents) were analyzed with respect to awareness, usage, and impact of PRW as well as patient preferences when searching online for physicians. (3) An analysis of the structure of online ratings for a random sample of 11% of German dermatologists was conducted. Results In total, we identified 29 PRWs. Slightly more than half of all respondents (54%) were aware of German PRW and every fourth respondent has already used PRW to search for a physician. Approximately 70% of all users stated they had already made a decision for or against a particular physician based on the quality ratings shown on PRW. Almost all dermatologists could be identified on PRW and 93% have already been rated on any PRW (mean number of ratings: 24.55). More than half of all ratings (55%) were positive. Conclusion After one decade of development, PRWs seem to have gained significant importance in the German health care sector. However, high-quality and adequately powered randomized controlled trials are required to determine the impact of PRWs on patient steerage.
引用
收藏
页码:851 / 858
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   National Hospital Ratings Systems Share Few Common Scores And May Generate Confusion Instead Of Clarity [J].
Austin, J. Matthew ;
Jha, Ashish K. ;
Romano, Patrick S. ;
Singer, Sara J. ;
Vogus, Timothy J. ;
Wachter, Robert M. ;
Pronovost, Peter J. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2015, 34 (03) :423-430
[2]  
Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2014, GES UNS DAT ERH 22 2
[3]   An International Comparison of Web-based Reporting About Health Care Quality: Content Analysis [J].
Damman, Olga C. ;
van den Hengel, Ylva K. A. ;
van Loon, A. Jeanne M. ;
Rademakers, Jany .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2010, 12 (02)
[4]   An Analysis of Online Evaluations on Physician-Rating Websites (PRW) at the Example of the German Integrated Healthcare Network "Quality and Efficiency" [J].
Emmert, M. ;
Gerstner, B. ;
Sander, U. ;
Wambach, V. .
GESUNDHEITSOEKONOMIE UND QUALITAETSMANAGEMENT, 2014, 19 (04) :161-167
[5]   Public Reporting in Germany: the Content of Physician Rating Websites [J].
Emmert, M. ;
Sander, U. ;
Esslinger, A. S. ;
Maryschok, M. ;
Schoeffski, O. .
METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 2012, 51 (02) :112-120
[6]  
Emmert M, 2009, GESUNDHEITSWESEN, V71, P218, DOI [10.1055/s-0028-1103278, 10.1055/s-0028-1103288]
[7]  
Emmert M, 2010, IMPLICONPLUS GESUNDH, V9
[8]  
Emmert M, 2014, IMPLICONPLUS GESUNDH, V9
[9]   Public reporting of hospital quality shows inconsistent ranking results [J].
Emmert, Martin ;
Taheri-Zadeh, Fatemeh ;
Kolb, Benjamin ;
Sander, Uwe .
HEALTH POLICY, 2017, 121 (01) :17-26
[10]   Do Health Care Providers Use Online Patient Ratings to Improve the Quality of Care? Results From an Online-Based Cross-Sectional Study [J].
Emmert, Martin ;
Meszmer, Nina ;
Sander, Uwe .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (09)