Enhancing the resilience of regional digital innovation ecosystems: a pathway analysis from the lens of resource orchestration theory

被引:7
作者
Du, Danli [1 ]
Jian, Xiaojie [1 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Engn Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Harbin 150001, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
R11; Q51; STRATEGY; ROLES;
D O I
10.1007/s00168-024-01305-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Enhancing the resilience of regional digital innovation ecosystems represents an effective strategy for managing risky shocks and fostering sustainable regional development. This study investigates the regional digital innovation ecosystems in 30 provinces and cities across China. Grounded in resource orchestration theory, this research employs the fsQCA method to examine the configuration paths through which traditional and digital resources and capabilities contribute to the resilience of these ecosystems. By developing an evaluative framework for the resilience of regional digital innovation ecosystems, this study reveals a fluctuating upward trend in resilience across China's regions, albeit with slow improvement rates and uneven development. The fsQCA identifies six configurational paths that bolster ecosystem resilience, categorized into two types: Technology Innovation-Digital Platforms and Financial-Physical Dominant. Furthermore, the paper highlights insufficient technological innovation capacity and imperfect digital governance as critical barriers to strengthening the resilience of regional digital innovation ecosystems. This research improves the evaluative framework for resilience in regional digital innovation ecosystems and extends the application of resource orchestration theory to the domain of resilience. The findings offer significant theoretical and practical insights into how regions can utilize both traditional and digital resources and capabilities to reinforce the resilience of their digital innovation ecosystems.
引用
收藏
页码:1811 / 1838
页数:28
相关论文
共 62 条
[11]   Shock absorber and shock diffuser: the multiple roles of industrial diversity in shaping regional economic resilience after the Great Recession [J].
Chen, Jing ;
Li, Xiaojing ;
Zhu, Yuanyuan .
ANNALS OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2024, 72 (03) :1015-1045
[12]  
Chesbrough H. W., 2003, Open Innovation. The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1467-8691.2008.00502.X
[13]   Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age [J].
Constantinides, Panos ;
Henfridsson, Ola ;
Parker, Geoffrey G. .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 (02) :381-400
[14]  
Cooke P., 2017, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, V3, P9, DOI DOI 10.1186/S40852-017-0060-5
[15]   BUILDING BETTER CAUSAL THEORIES: A FUZZY SET APPROACH TO TYPOLOGIES IN ORGANIZATION RESEARCH [J].
Fiss, Peer C. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2011, 54 (02) :393-420
[16]   Performance implications of the fit between suppliers' flexibility and their customers' expected flexibility: A dyadic examination [J].
Gligor, David .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2018, 58-59 :73-85
[17]  
Hao W, 2021, IOP C SERIES EARTH E
[18]   Emerging regional innovation policies for industry 4.0: analyzing the digital innovation hub program in European regions [J].
Hervas-Oliver, Jose-Luis ;
Gonzalez-Alcaide, Gregorio ;
Rojas-Alvarado, Ronald ;
Monto-Mompo, Silvia .
COMPETITIVENESS REVIEW, 2021, 31 (01) :106-129
[19]  
Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
[20]  
Holling C.S., 1996, Eng. Ecol. Constr., V31, P32, DOI DOI 10.17226/4919