Diagnostic Performance of Machine Learning-based Models in Neonatal Sepsis: A Systematic Review

被引:0
|
作者
Kainth, Deepika [1 ]
Prakash, Satya [1 ]
Sankar, M. Jeeva [1 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Pediat, Room 818,8th floor,Mother & Child Block, New Delhi 110029, India
关键词
neonate; sepsis; machine learning; PREDICTION; RISK;
D O I
10.1097/INF.0000000000004409
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background:Timely diagnosis of neonatal sepsis is challenging. We aimed to systematically evaluate the diagnostic performance of sophisticated machine learning (ML) techniques for the prediction of neonatal sepsis.Methods:We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane CENTRAL databases using "neonate," "sepsis" and "machine learning" as search terms. We included studies that developed or validated an ML algorithm to predict neonatal sepsis. Those incorporating automated vital-sign data were excluded. Among 5008 records, 74 full-text articles were screened. Two reviewers extracted information as per the CHARMS (CHecklist for critical Appraisal and data extraction for systematic Reviews of prediction Modelling Studies) checklist. We followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guideline extension for diagnostic test accuracy reviews and used the PROBAST tool for risk of bias assessment. Primary outcome was a predictive performance of ML models in terms of sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values. We generated a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics curve for pooled analysis.Results:Of 19 studies (15,984 participants) with 76 ML models, the random forest algorithm was the most employed. The candidate predictors per model ranged from 5 to 93; most included birth weight and gestation. None performed external validation. The risk of bias was high (18 studies). For the prediction of any sepsis (14 studies), pooled sensitivity was 0.87 (95% credible interval: 0.75-0.94) and specificity was 0.89 (95% credible interval: 0.77-0.95). Pooled area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.94 (95% credible interval: 0.92-0.96). All studies, except one, used data from high- or upper-middle-income countries. With unavailable probability thresholds, the performance could not be assessed with sufficient precision.Conclusions:ML techniques have good diagnostic accuracy for neonatal sepsis. The need for the development of context-specific models from high-burden countries is highlighted.
引用
收藏
页码:889 / 901
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of machine learning and deep learning prediction models for sepsis and neonatal sepsis: A systematic review
    Parvin, A. Safiya
    Saleena, B.
    ICT EXPRESS, 2023, 9 (06): : 1215 - 1225
  • [2] Association of Clinician Diagnostic Performance With Machine Learning-Based Decision Support Systems A Systematic Review
    Vasey, Baptiste
    Ursprung, Stephan
    Beddoe, Benjamin
    Taylor, Elliott H.
    Marlow, Neale
    Bilbro, Nicole
    Watkinson, Peter
    McCulloch, Peter
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (03)
  • [3] Machine learning-based infection diagnostic and prognostic models in post-acute care settings: a systematic review
    Xu, Zidu
    Scharp, Danielle
    Hobensek, Mollie
    Ye, Jiancheng
    Zou, Jungang
    Ding, Sirui
    Shang, Jingjing
    Topaz, Maxim
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2024,
  • [4] MACHINE LEARNING MODELS FOR PREDICTING MORTALITY IN SEPSIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Nikravangolsefid, Nasrin
    Reddy, Swetha
    Hong Hieu Troung
    Charkviani, Mariam
    Ninan, Jacob
    Kashani, Kianoush
    Garces, Juan Pablo Domecq
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 52
  • [5] A systematic review of machine learning-based microscopic traffic flow models and simulations
    Rowan, Davies
    He, Haitao
    Hui, Fang
    Yasir, Ali
    Mohammed, Quddus
    COMMUNICATIONS IN TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH, 2025, 5
  • [6] MACHINE LEARNING MODELS FOR PREDICTING MORTALITY IN SEPSIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Kobayashi, Hirotada
    Amrein, Karin
    Lasky-Su, Jessica
    Christopher, Kenneth
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 52
  • [7] MACHINE LEARNING-BASED PREDICTION MODELS FOR C DIFFICILE INFECTION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Tariq, Raseen
    Redij, Renisha
    Arunachalam, Shivaram Poigai
    Faubion, William
    Khanna, Sahil
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 164 (06) : S1176 - S1176
  • [8] Machine Learning-Based Predictive Models for Patients with Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review
    Danilatou, Vasiliki
    Dimopoulos, Dimitrios
    Kostoulas, Theodoros
    Douketis, James
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2024, 124 (11) : 1040 - 1052
  • [9] Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models for Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Systematic Review
    Tariq, Raseen
    Malik, Sheza
    Redij, Renisha
    Arunachalam, Shivaram
    Faubion, Jr William A.
    Khanna, Sahil
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 15 (06)
  • [10] Machine Learning-Based Early Prediction of Sepsis Using Electronic Health Records: A Systematic Review
    Islam, Khandaker Reajul
    Prithula, Johayra
    Kumar, Jaya
    Tan, Toh Leong
    Reaz, Mamun Bin Ibne
    Sumon, Md. Shaheenur Islam
    Chowdhury, Muhammad E. H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (17)