Effects of Student Response Systems on Learning Outcomes

被引:1
作者
Akintomide, Adebola [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Dan J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Texas, Denton, TX 76201 USA
[2] Univ North Texas, G Brint Ryan Coll Business, ITDS Dept, 1307 W Highland, Denton, TX 76201 USA
关键词
Student response systems; learning outcomes; systematic review; mixed methods; bibliometric analysis; FORMATIVE FEEDBACK; CLICKER TECHNOLOGY; CLASSROOM; ENGAGEMENT; IMPACT; PERCEPTIONS; PERFORMANCE; SATISFACTION; MOTIVATION; QUESTIONS;
D O I
10.1080/08874417.2024.2347540
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
As education evolves from traditional lecture-style teaching to more interactive and collaborative methods using information and communication technologies, student response systems (SRS) have become increasingly popular in both offline and online classes. However, despite the attention given to SRS's potential to enhance active learning, it remains unclear whether their implementation leads to improved learning. Therefore, the objective of this study is to conduct a systematic literature review using the mixed methods methodology to identify and confirm relevant learning outcomes associated with SRS, such as classroom dynamics, understanding, classroom performance, remembering, and likeness. In addition, bibliometric analysis enables us to uncover the trend and intellectual dynamics in the SRS literature. The study aims to investigate the impact of SRS on different learning outcomes and discuss the implications of the findings.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 164 条
[1]   A Tale of Two Institutions: Analyzing the Impact of Gamified Student Response Systems on Student Anxiety in Two Different Introductory Biology Courses [J].
Adkins-Jablonsky, Sarah J. ;
Shaffer, Justin F. ;
Morris, J. Jeffrey ;
England, Ben ;
Raut, Samiksha .
CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2021, 20 (02)
[2]   Students' perceptions of Kahoot!: An exploratory mixed-method study in EFL undergraduate classrooms in the UAE [J].
Alawadhi, Azza ;
Abu-Ayyash, Emad A. S. .
EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2021, 26 (04) :3629-3658
[3]   Research trends in student response systems: a literature review [J].
Aljaloud, Abdulaziz ;
Gromik, Nicolas ;
Billingsley, William ;
Kwan, Paul .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEARNING TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 10 (04) :313-325
[4]   Do clickers work for students with poorer grades and in harder courses? [J].
Anderson, Scott ;
Goss, Allen ;
Inglis, Mike ;
Kaplan, Alan ;
Samarbakhsh, Laleh ;
Toffanin, Melissa .
JOURNAL OF FURTHER AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 42 (06) :797-807
[5]   bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis [J].
Aria, Massimo ;
Cuccurullo, Corrado .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2017, 11 (04) :959-975
[6]   Effect of audience response system technology on learning outcomes in health students and professionals: an updated systematic review [J].
Atlantis, Evan ;
Cheema, Birinder S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2015, 13 (01) :3-8
[7]   Using audience response system in a third world country: The good, bad and ugly [J].
Ayebi-Arthur, Kofi ;
Acheaw Owusu, Kofi .
E-LEARNING AND DIGITAL MEDIA, 2020, 17 (05) :408-424
[8]   Impact of Audience Response System in Enhancing Teaching of Anatomy and Physiology for Health Sciences Students at King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences [J].
Baashar, Ahmaed ;
Kumar, Raju Suresh ;
Akhtar, S. M. Irshad ;
Alyousif, Sarah M. ;
Alhassan, Abdulaziz, I ;
Townsi, Nada .
ADVANCES IN MEDICAL EDUCATION AND PRACTICE, 2023, 14 :421-432
[9]  
Bachman Leonard, 2011, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, V22, P5
[10]   Using Socrative software for instant formative feedback in physics courses [J].
Balta, Nuri ;
Tzafilkou, Katerina .
EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, 24 (01) :307-323