A cost-benefit analysis of flood early warning system: Evidence from lower Brahmaputra River Basin, Bangladesh

被引:3
|
作者
Islam, Abu Reza Md Towfiqul [1 ,8 ]
Al Mamun, Abdullah [1 ]
Rahman, Md Naimur [2 ,8 ,9 ]
Akter, Mst Yeasmin [1 ]
Chisty, Musabber Ali [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Alam, G. M. Monirul [6 ]
Mallick, Javed [7 ]
Sohel, Md Salman [8 ]
机构
[1] Begum Rokeya Univ, Dept Disaster Management, Rangpur 5400, Bangladesh
[2] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Geog, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Colorado Boulder, Dept Sociol, Boulder, CO USA
[4] Univ Colorado Boulder, Inst Behav Sci, Nat Hazards Ctr, Boulder, CO USA
[5] Univ Dhaka, Inst Disaster Management & Vulnerabil Studies, Dhaka, Bangladesh
[6] Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agr Univ, Dept Agribusiness, Salna 1706, Gazipur, Bangladesh
[7] King Khalid Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia
[8] Daffodil Int Univ, Dept Dev Studies, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh
[9] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, David C Lam Inst East West Studies, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Cost-benefit analysis; Disaster risk reduction; Brahmaputra River Basin; Loss and damage ratio; Flood early warning; CLIMATE-CHANGE ADAPTATION; DISASTER RISK; RESILIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104380
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Bangladesh is a severely flood -affected country that ranks fifth globally. Although it is well established that regional and community -based flood early warning systems (FEWS) may minimize the effects of floods, cost -benefit analyses of FEWS are still limited in Bangladesh. This is the first study to assess the cost -benefit of the FEWS in lower Brahmaputra River basin in Bangladesh which included 1000 household surveys, 32 focus group discussion, and key informant interviews. The findings indicated that during the floods, families considered the FEWS to be useful and trustworthy, enabling them to preserve household assets, agricultural, and livestock expenditures worth of BDT 267713 (USD 2525.59) per household. Based on the different scenarios, the benefit -cost ratio (BCR) ranged from 79.87 to 213. About 92% of the respondents expressed willingness to pay an annual charge of BDT 100.63 (USD 0.94) for five years if the community disaster committees were to handle the current FEWS. This might generate BDT 100637 (USD 949.40) annually, to pay for the system's maintenance and operations. As communities' advance confidence in the FEWS system and lead times are enhanced, FEWS increasingly changes their behaviors over time, leading to enhanced social capital and a broader range of early interventions that lessen preventable loss and damage. By extending the forecast lead time by two days, the present savings could increase by 21.7 times. To increase funding, government and non -government organizations may make decisions based on the findings of the cost -benefit analysis. This study also proposed a FEWS applicable in the local level.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Cost-benefit analysis of flood early warning system in the Karnali River Basin of Nepal
    Rai, Rajesh Kumar
    van den Homberg, Marc J. C.
    Ghimire, Gopal Prasad
    McQuistan, Colin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2020, 47
  • [2] Cost-benefit of promising adaptations for resilient development in climate hotspots: evidence from lower Teesta basin in Bangladesh
    Arfanuzzaman, Md
    Hassan, S. M. Tanvir
    Abu Syed, Md
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2021, 12 (01) : 44 - 59
  • [3] A cost-benefit analysis of Basel III: Some evidence from the UK
    Yan, Meilan
    Hall, Maximilian J. B.
    Turner, Paul
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 25 : 73 - 82
  • [4] Cost-benefit analysis of implementing a pediatric early warning system at a pediatric oncology hospital in a low-middle income country
    Agulnik, Asya
    Antillon-Klussmann, Federico
    Soberanis Vasquez, Dora Judith
    Arango, Rosa
    Moran, Elmer
    Lopez, Victor
    Rodriguez-Galindo, Carlos
    Bhakta, Nickhill
    CANCER, 2019, 125 (22) : 4052 - 4058
  • [5] A Farmer-Centric Cost-Benefit Analysis of Climate-Smart Agriculture in the Gandaki River Basin of Nepal
    Poudel, Shobha
    Thapa, Rabin
    Mishra, Bhogendra
    CLIMATE, 2024, 12 (09)
  • [6] Cost-benefit analysis of applied research infrastructure. Evidence from health care
    Battistoni, Giuseppe
    Genco, Mario
    Marsilio, Marta
    Pancotti, Chiara
    Rossi, Sandro
    Vignetti, Silvia
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2016, 112 : 79 - 91
  • [7] Applying cost-benefit analysis to the economic evaluation of a tram-train system: Evidence from Brescia (Italy)
    De Aloe, Maria
    Ventura, Roberto
    Bonera, Michela
    Barabino, Benedetto
    Maternini, Giulio
    RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 47
  • [8] Is straw return-to-field always beneficial? Evidence from an integrated cost-benefit analysis
    Liu, Beibei
    Wu, Qiaoran
    Wang, Feng
    Zhang, Bing
    ENERGY, 2019, 171 : 393 - 402
  • [9] Cost-benefit analysis of the Hukou reform: Simulation evidence from a theoretical labor market model
    Song, Yang
    CHINA ECONOMIC QUARTERLY INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 1 (02): : 109 - 119
  • [10] Difficulties for cost-benefit analysis in the 2020 environmental impact statement to recover the endangered wild salmon and steelhead in the Columbia River Basin
    McKean, John R.
    Johnson, Donn M.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 246 : 434 - 443