Alternative margin models for mortgage-backed securities

被引:0
作者
Li, David [1 ]
Cheruvelil, Roy [1 ]
Baklanova, Viktoria [1 ]
机构
[1] US Secur & Exchange Commiss, 100 St Northeast, Washington, DC 20549 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL MARKET INFRASTRUCTURES | 2024年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
agency mortgage-backed securities (MBSs); generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity t-copula (GARCH- t-copula); filtered historical simulation (FHS); fat-tailed distribution; margin model; central clearing counterparties (CCPs); MARKET;
D O I
10.21314/JFMI.2024.002
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Most US mortgages are traded in the form of mortgage -backed securities (MBSs) guaranteed by the US government -sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the government agency Ginnie Mae. A significant portion of agency MBSs trading occurs in the to -be -announced forward market. Yet, the existing margin models for TBA/MBSs mostly rely on mortgage model suites such as interest rate, prepayment and potentially other macroeconomic models, which makes the modeling process intrinsically complicated from both a model risk perspective and an operational risk perspective. In addition to these complexities, dynamics in the housing market, changes to mortgage regulatory regimes and governmental interventions always make mortgage modeling a challenge (as evidenced historically). In this paper, we conduct a study of margin models for to -be -announced MBSs using common margin frameworks for market risk such as the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH) t -copula and filtered historical simulation approaches. These are commonly used for other asset classes such as credit default swaps and equity -based markets but have not been widely used in the MBSs market. Such econometric models, which rely solely on market volatility and price return behavior, could potentially be used as a supplemental model framework for to -be -announced MBS margin and stress testing purposes.
引用
收藏
页数:82
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Holistic Review of the March Marker Turmoil
[2]  
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision-Committee on Payments and Market Infra-structures-International Organization of Securities Commissions, 2022, Report
[3]   Trading Activity and Transaction Costs in Structured Credit Products [J].
Bessembinder, Hendrik ;
Maxwell, William F. ;
Venkataraman, Kumar .
FINANCIAL ANALYSTS JOURNAL, 2013, 69 (06) :55-67
[4]  
Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems-Technical Committee of the International Organization of Securities Commissions, 2012, CPMI Paper 101
[5]  
Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures-Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions, 2017, Final Report
[6]  
Cont R., 2011, Working Paper, DOI DOI 10.2139/SSRN.1771862
[7]  
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, 2016, Regulatory Notice 16-31
[8]  
Fixed Income Clearing Corporation, 2023, White Paper
[9]  
Fuster A., 2022, Staff Report 1001
[10]   Liquidity in a Market for Unique Assets: Specified Pool and To-Be-Announced Trading in the Mortgage-Backed Securities Market [J].
Gao, Pengjie ;
Schultz, Paul ;
Song, Zhaogang .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2017, 72 (03) :1119-1170