Cloud service prioritization using a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making technique in a cloud computing environment

被引:1
|
作者
Makwe, Aditya [1 ]
Kanungo, Priyesh [2 ]
Kautish, Sandeep [3 ]
Madhu, Golla [4 ]
Almazyad, Abdulaziz S. [5 ]
Xiong, Guojiang [6 ]
Mohamed, Ali Wagdy [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] DAVV, Inst Engn & Technol, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
[2] DAVV, Sch Comp Sci & IT, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
[3] Chandigarh Univ, Apex Inst Technol, Mohali 140413, Punjab, India
[4] VNR Vignana Jyothi Inst Engn & Technol, Dept Informat Technol, Hyderabad 90, TS, India
[5] King Saud Univ, Coll Comp & Informat Sci, Dept Comp Engn, POB 51178, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia
[6] Guizhou Univ, Coll Elect Engn, Guizhou Key Lab Intelligent Technol Power Syst, Guiyang 550025, Peoples R China
[7] Cairo Univ, Fac Grad Studies Stat Res, Operat Res Dept, Giza 12613, Egypt
[8] Appl Sci Private Univ, Appl Sci Res Ctr, Amman 11931, Jordan
关键词
Cloud computing; Multi criteria decision making; Interval neutrosophic set; Cloud service provider; CYBER SECURITY; SELECTION; FRAMEWORK; RANKING; SETS;
D O I
10.1016/j.asej.2024.102785
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Many companies are now moving their business to the cloud because the cloud provides user with unlimited resources and uninterrupted service. The aim of the paper is to rank services provided by a set of cloud-providers based on multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. The ranking of the cloud-providers set is based on the Interval neutrosophic set theory (INS). The paper proposes INS and TOPSIS techniques to help users and experts express their evaluations and rank cloud-providers based on various criteria. INS is used to deal with the imprecise knowledge, generated by the ambiguity from the experts ' evaluations. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the framework, the closeness index (CI) values of CSPs were ranked in decreasing order. A numerical example for a case study for a set 6 CSP and 10 criteria is presented. The numerical results show that SoftLayer ' s is the best cloud-provider with a CI value equal to 0.69. The worst cloud-provider is Microsoft Azure with a CI value equal to 0.20. A sensitivity analysis was performed to check the consistency and robustness of the model.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multi-criteria group decision-making with cloud model and TOPSIS for alternative selection under uncertainty
    Zhang, Limao
    Chen, Weiyi
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2022, 26 (22) : 12509 - 12529
  • [42] Multi-criteria Group Decision-making Method Based on Expert Trust Network and Cloud Model
    Luo, Xin
    Zhang, Huajun
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 33RD CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (CCDC 2021), 2021, : 3949 - 3953
  • [43] Decision Making Criteria for Cloud Computing Deployment
    Maresova, Petra
    Advanced Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering: Future Information Technology, 2015, 352 : 93 - 98
  • [44] A new trust management framework based on the experience of users in industrial cloud computing using multi-criteria decision making
    Khoruzhy, Liudmila Ivanovna
    Bulyga, Roman Petrovich
    Voronkova, Olga Yuryevna
    Vasyutkina, Lidia Vladimirovna
    Saenko, Natalya Ryafikovna
    Poltarykhin, Andrey Leonidovich
    Aravindhan, Surendar
    KYBERNETES, 2022, 51 (06) : 1949 - 1966
  • [45] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Bipolar Fuzzy Environment
    M. A. Alghamdi
    Noura Omair Alshehri
    Muhammad Akram
    International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 20 : 2057 - 2064
  • [46] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Bipolar Fuzzy Environment
    Alghamdi, M. A.
    Alshehri, Noura Omair
    Akram, Muhammad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2018, 20 (06) : 2057 - 2064
  • [47] Extending the WEDBA to the fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making environment
    Al-Hawari, Tarek
    Naji, Ahmed
    Alshraideh, Hussam
    Bataineh, Omar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 59 (04) : 330 - 346
  • [48] Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach to prioritization of space debris for removal
    Bazzocchi, Michael C. F.
    Miguel Sanchez-Lozano, Juan
    Hakima, Houman
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2021, 67 (03) : 1155 - 1173
  • [49] Prioritization of habitat construction materials on Mars based on multi-criteria decision-making
    Iranfar, Soha
    Karbala, Mohammad Mehdi
    Shahsavari, Mohammad Hossein
    Vandeginste, Veerle
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2023, 66
  • [50] A Group Decision-Making Method for Selecting Cloud Computing Service Model
    Al-Jabri, Ibrahim M.
    Eid, Mustafa I.
    Sohail, M. Sadiq
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2018, 9 (01) : 449 - 456