Cloud service prioritization using a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making technique in a cloud computing environment

被引:1
|
作者
Makwe, Aditya [1 ]
Kanungo, Priyesh [2 ]
Kautish, Sandeep [3 ]
Madhu, Golla [4 ]
Almazyad, Abdulaziz S. [5 ]
Xiong, Guojiang [6 ]
Mohamed, Ali Wagdy [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] DAVV, Inst Engn & Technol, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
[2] DAVV, Sch Comp Sci & IT, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
[3] Chandigarh Univ, Apex Inst Technol, Mohali 140413, Punjab, India
[4] VNR Vignana Jyothi Inst Engn & Technol, Dept Informat Technol, Hyderabad 90, TS, India
[5] King Saud Univ, Coll Comp & Informat Sci, Dept Comp Engn, POB 51178, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia
[6] Guizhou Univ, Coll Elect Engn, Guizhou Key Lab Intelligent Technol Power Syst, Guiyang 550025, Peoples R China
[7] Cairo Univ, Fac Grad Studies Stat Res, Operat Res Dept, Giza 12613, Egypt
[8] Appl Sci Private Univ, Appl Sci Res Ctr, Amman 11931, Jordan
关键词
Cloud computing; Multi criteria decision making; Interval neutrosophic set; Cloud service provider; CYBER SECURITY; SELECTION; FRAMEWORK; RANKING; SETS;
D O I
10.1016/j.asej.2024.102785
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Many companies are now moving their business to the cloud because the cloud provides user with unlimited resources and uninterrupted service. The aim of the paper is to rank services provided by a set of cloud-providers based on multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. The ranking of the cloud-providers set is based on the Interval neutrosophic set theory (INS). The paper proposes INS and TOPSIS techniques to help users and experts express their evaluations and rank cloud-providers based on various criteria. INS is used to deal with the imprecise knowledge, generated by the ambiguity from the experts ' evaluations. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the framework, the closeness index (CI) values of CSPs were ranked in decreasing order. A numerical example for a case study for a set 6 CSP and 10 criteria is presented. The numerical results show that SoftLayer ' s is the best cloud-provider with a CI value equal to 0.69. The worst cloud-provider is Microsoft Azure with a CI value equal to 0.20. A sensitivity analysis was performed to check the consistency and robustness of the model.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Task Scheduling Mechanism Using Multi-criteria Decision-making Technique, MACBETH in Cloud Computing
    Nayak, Suvendu Chandan
    Parida, Sasmita
    Tripathy, Chitaranjan
    Pattnaik, Prasant Kumar
    PROGRESS IN COMPUTING, ANALYTICS AND NETWORKING, ICCAN 2017, 2018, 710 : 381 - 392
  • [2] A Trust Framework Utilization in Cloud Computing Environment Based on Multi-criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Trabay, Doaa Wagdy
    El-Henawy, Ibrahim
    Gharibi, Wajeb
    COMPUTER JOURNAL, 2022, 65 (04): : 997 - 1005
  • [3] A multi-criteria decision making heuristic for workflow scheduling in cloud computing environment
    Kamanga, Celestin Tshimanga
    Bugingo, Emmanuel
    Badibanga, Simon Ntumba
    Mukendi, Eugene Mbuyi
    JOURNAL OF SUPERCOMPUTING, 2023, 79 (01): : 243 - 264
  • [4] An efficient composite cloud service model using multi-criteria decision-making techniques
    Munmun Saha
    Sanjaya Kumar Panda
    Suvasini Panigrahi
    David Taniar
    The Journal of Supercomputing, 2023, 79 : 8754 - 8788
  • [5] An efficient composite cloud service model using multi-criteria decision-making techniques
    Saha, Munmun
    Panda, Sanjaya Kumar
    Panigrahi, Suvasini
    Taniar, David
    JOURNAL OF SUPERCOMPUTING, 2023, 79 (08): : 8754 - 8788
  • [6] A multi-criteria decision making heuristic for workflow scheduling in cloud computing environment
    Célestin Tshimanga Kamanga
    Emmanuel Bugingo
    Simon Ntumba Badibanga
    Eugène Mbuyi Mukendi
    The Journal of Supercomputing, 2023, 79 : 243 - 264
  • [7] Deadline based task scheduling using multi-criteria decision-making in cloud environment
    Nayak, Suvendu Chandan
    Tripathy, Chitaranjan
    AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2018, 9 (04) : 3315 - 3324
  • [8] Prioritizing the Critical Factors of Cloud Computing Adoption Using Multi-criteria Decision-making Techniques
    Sharma, Mahak
    Gupta, Ruchita
    Acharya, Padmanav
    GLOBAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2020, 21 (01) : 142 - 161
  • [9] An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Cloud Service Provider Selection
    Uma, S.
    Geetha, Evangelin D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [10] A fuzzy AHP based multi-criteria decision-making model to select a cloud service
    Seo, K.K. (kwangkyu@smu.ac.kr), 1600, Science and Engineering Research Support Society (08):