Evaluation of Ground Motion Damage Potential with Consideration of Compound Intensity Measures Using Principal Component Analysis and Canonical Correlation Analysis

被引:2
作者
Liu, Tingting [1 ]
Lu, Dagang [2 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Zhenjiang 212100, Peoples R China
[2] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Harbin 150090, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
ground motion damage potential; intensity measures; correlation coefficient; principal component analysis; canonical correlation analysis; SEISMIC DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE; DEMAND; SCALAR; PARAMETERS; SELECTION; BRIDGES; DESIGN; MODELS; RISE;
D O I
10.3390/buildings14051309
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The primary motivation of this study is to develop a compound intensity measure (IM) to evaluate ground motion damage potential based on principal component analysis (PCA) and canonical correlation analysis (CCA). To illustrate this, this study examines the correlation among intragroup IMs and intergroup IMs, as well as the correlation between various IMs and response variables. A compound IM, which can be obtained by a linear combination of ten IMs in the log-scale, is utilized to measure the ground motion damage potential. Elastoplastic, bilinear and hysteretic models are utilized to determine peak deformation and hysteretic energy as the response variables of Single-Degree-of-Freedom (SDOF) systems. On the basis of the SDOF systems, the overall structural damage index is obtained by a nonlinear time-history analysis for two reinforced concrete moment frame systems. It is clear that the developed compound IM shows significantly high-level correlation with structural response. The better the correlations, the more one can measure the earthquake damage potential. A single IM alone inadequately characterizes structural damage, highlighting the necessity of multiple IMs to estimate the possibility of structural damage.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 60 条
[11]  
Cordova P., 2001, Proceedings of the 2nd US-Japan workshop on performance-based earthquake engineering methodology for RC building structures, P187
[12]   Correlation study between seismic acceleration parameters and damage indices of structures [J].
Elenas, A ;
Meskouris, K .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2001, 23 (06) :698-704
[13]   Ground motion selection based on a multi-intensity-measure conditioning approach with emphasis on diverse earthquake contents [J].
Ghotbi, Abdoul R. ;
Taciroglu, Ertugrul .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2021, 50 (05) :1378-1394
[14]   Comparing the adequacy of alternative ground motion intensity measures for the estimation of structural responses [J].
Giovenale, P ;
Cornell, CA ;
Esteva, L .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2004, 33 (08) :951-979
[15]   Probabilistic seismic demand model and optimal intensity measure for concrete dams [J].
Hariri-Ardebili, M. A. ;
Saouma, V. E. .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2016, 59 :67-85
[16]   Seismic Collapse Safety of Reinforced Concrete Buildings. I: Assessment of Ductile Moment Frames [J].
Haselton, Curt B. ;
Liel, Abbie B. ;
Deierlein, Gregory G. ;
Dean, Brian S. ;
Chou, Jason H. .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 137 (04) :481-491
[17]   Multi-Objective Optimization of Three Different SMA-LRBs for Seismic Protection of a Benchmark Highway Bridge against Real and Synthetic Ground Motions [J].
Hosseini, Reyhaneh ;
Rashidi, Maria ;
Bulajic, Borko D. ;
Arani, Kamyar Karbasi .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (12)
[18]   The most predictable criterion [J].
Hotelling, H .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1935, 26 :139-142
[19]  
Housner G.W., 1975, Proceedings of the U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, EERI, Ann Arbor, P25
[20]  
Housner G.W Paul C Jennings., 1982, EARTHQUAKE DESIGN CR