Evaluation of Ground Motion Damage Potential with Consideration of Compound Intensity Measures Using Principal Component Analysis and Canonical Correlation Analysis

被引:2
作者
Liu, Tingting [1 ]
Lu, Dagang [2 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Zhenjiang 212100, Peoples R China
[2] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Harbin 150090, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
ground motion damage potential; intensity measures; correlation coefficient; principal component analysis; canonical correlation analysis; SEISMIC DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE; DEMAND; SCALAR; PARAMETERS; SELECTION; BRIDGES; DESIGN; MODELS; RISE;
D O I
10.3390/buildings14051309
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The primary motivation of this study is to develop a compound intensity measure (IM) to evaluate ground motion damage potential based on principal component analysis (PCA) and canonical correlation analysis (CCA). To illustrate this, this study examines the correlation among intragroup IMs and intergroup IMs, as well as the correlation between various IMs and response variables. A compound IM, which can be obtained by a linear combination of ten IMs in the log-scale, is utilized to measure the ground motion damage potential. Elastoplastic, bilinear and hysteretic models are utilized to determine peak deformation and hysteretic energy as the response variables of Single-Degree-of-Freedom (SDOF) systems. On the basis of the SDOF systems, the overall structural damage index is obtained by a nonlinear time-history analysis for two reinforced concrete moment frame systems. It is clear that the developed compound IM shows significantly high-level correlation with structural response. The better the correlations, the more one can measure the earthquake damage potential. A single IM alone inadequately characterizes structural damage, highlighting the necessity of multiple IMs to estimate the possibility of structural damage.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Displacement-based fragility functions for low- and mid-rise ordinary concrete buildings [J].
Akkar, S ;
Sucuoglu, H ;
Yakut, A .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2005, 21 (04) :901-927
[2]   Effect of peak ground velocity on deformation demands for SDOF systems [J].
Akkar, S ;
Özen, Ö .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2005, 34 (13) :1551-1571
[3]  
Baker J.W., 2011, NEW GROUND MOTION SE
[4]  
Bianchini M., 2009, 10 INT C STRUCT SAF
[5]   The variability of deformation demand with ground motion intensity [J].
Cantagallo, Cristina ;
Camata, Guido ;
Spacone, Enrico ;
Corotis, Ross .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2012, 28 :59-65
[6]   Assessment of tunnel damage potential by ground motion using canonical correlation analysis [J].
Chen, Changjian ;
Geng, Ping ;
Gu, Wenqi ;
Lu, Zhikai ;
Ren, Bainan .
EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES, 2022, 23 (03) :259-269
[7]   Ranking method of the severest input ground motion for underground structures based on composite ground motion intensity measures [J].
Chen, Zhiyi ;
Yu, Wei ;
Zhu, Hehua ;
Xie, Lili .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2023, 168
[8]   NGA project strong-motion database [J].
Chiou, Brian ;
Darragh, Robert ;
Gregor, Nick ;
Silva, Walter .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2008, 24 (01) :23-44
[9]  
Chopra A. K., 2001, Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering, DOI DOI 10.1193/1.2720354
[10]   A novel approach to improve accuracy in seismic fragility analysis: The modified intensity measure method [J].
Ciano, M. ;
Gioffre, M. ;
Grigoriu, M. .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2022, 69