A systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies on mathematics and science pedagogical content knowledge

被引:0
作者
Fukaya, Tatsushi [1 ]
Nakamura, Daiki [1 ]
Kitayama, Yoshie [1 ]
Nakagoshi, Takumi [1 ]
机构
[1] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Higashihiroshima, Japan
关键词
pedagogical content knowledge; intervention; meta-analysis; systematic review; meta-regression analysis; TEACHERS PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; STUDENT-ACHIEVEMENT; PRESERVICE; CLASSROOM; INTERPLAY; ATTITUDES; BELIEFS; IMPACT; BIAS;
D O I
10.3389/feduc.2024.1435758
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) has been considered as professional knowledge that teachers need to effectively instruct students. Empirical studies have been conducted to enrich teachers' PCK through interventions such as professional development programs. In this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies about PCK interventions and their quantitative evaluation among mathematics or science teachers at the elementary and secondary education levels. We identified 101 effect sizes (42 for multiple group comparison designs and 59 for multiple time point comparison designs) and found that the interventions had a positive effect in both designs. The results of the meta-regression analysis showed that in the multiple group design, the effects differed by intervention target, with higher scores for the PCK intervention than for the CK-only intervention, and in the multiple time point design, the effects differed by subjects treated, with higher scores for the science materials than for the mathematics materials. These results not only demonstrate the average effectiveness of previous studies aimed at improving teachers' PCK but also provide insights into effective designs for professional development methods that promote PCK acquisition.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 94 条
[11]   Resolving the chicken-or-egg causality dilemma: The longitudinal interplay of teacher knowledge and teacher beliefs [J].
Bloemeke, Sigrid ;
Buchholtz, Nils ;
Suhl, Ute ;
Kaiser, Gabriele .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2014, 37 :130-139
[12]  
Blomeke S., 2014, International Perspectives on Teacher Knowledge, Beliefs and Opportunities to Learn, P19, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-6437-8_2
[13]  
Boker J. R., 2016, doctoral dissertation
[14]  
Borenstein M., 2009, INTRO META ANAL, DOI [10.1002/9780470743386, DOI 10.1002/9780470743386]
[15]  
BRANSFORD JD, 2000, PEOPLE LEARN BRAIN M, DOI [10.17226/9853, DOI 10.17226/9853]
[16]  
Brophy J., 1986, HDB RES TEACHING, V3rd
[17]  
Brownlee J., 2001, Teaching in Higher Education, V6, P247, DOI 10.1080/13562510120045221
[18]   IMPROVING MATHEMATICS TEACHER EDUCATION IN GERMANY: EMPIRICAL RESULTS FROM A LONGITUDINAL EVALUATION OF INNOVATIVE PROGRAMS [J].
Buchholtz, Nils ;
Kaiser, Gabriele .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2013, 11 (04) :949-977
[19]   Explaining Student Achievement: the Influence of Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Statistics [J].
Callingham, Rosemary ;
Carmichael, Colin ;
Watson, Jane M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2016, 14 (07) :1339-1357
[20]  
Castronova M. A., 2018, Examining Teachers' Acceptance of the Next Generation Science Standards: A Study of Teachers' pedagogical Discontentment and pedagogical Gontent knowledge of Modeling and Argumentation