A systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies on mathematics and science pedagogical content knowledge

被引:0
作者
Fukaya, Tatsushi [1 ]
Nakamura, Daiki [1 ]
Kitayama, Yoshie [1 ]
Nakagoshi, Takumi [1 ]
机构
[1] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Higashihiroshima, Japan
关键词
pedagogical content knowledge; intervention; meta-analysis; systematic review; meta-regression analysis; TEACHERS PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; STUDENT-ACHIEVEMENT; PRESERVICE; CLASSROOM; INTERPLAY; ATTITUDES; BELIEFS; IMPACT; BIAS;
D O I
10.3389/feduc.2024.1435758
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) has been considered as professional knowledge that teachers need to effectively instruct students. Empirical studies have been conducted to enrich teachers' PCK through interventions such as professional development programs. In this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies about PCK interventions and their quantitative evaluation among mathematics or science teachers at the elementary and secondary education levels. We identified 101 effect sizes (42 for multiple group comparison designs and 59 for multiple time point comparison designs) and found that the interventions had a positive effect in both designs. The results of the meta-regression analysis showed that in the multiple group design, the effects differed by intervention target, with higher scores for the PCK intervention than for the CK-only intervention, and in the multiple time point design, the effects differed by subjects treated, with higher scores for the science materials than for the mathematics materials. These results not only demonstrate the average effectiveness of previous studies aimed at improving teachers' PCK but also provide insights into effective designs for professional development methods that promote PCK acquisition.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]   Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? [J].
Abell, Sandra K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2008, 30 (10) :1405-1416
[2]   Declarative and Dynamic Pedagogical Content Knowledge as Elicited Through Two Video-Based Interview Methods [J].
Alonzo, Alicia C. ;
Kim, Jiwon .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2016, 53 (08) :1259-1286
[3]  
Ball D.L., 2001, HDB RES TEACHING, V4th, P433
[4]   Content Knowledge for Teaching What Makes It Special? [J].
Ball, Deborah Loewenberg ;
Thames, Mark Hoover ;
Phelps, Geoffrey .
JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 2008, 59 (05) :389-407
[5]  
Baumert J., 2013, Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers: Results from the COACTIC Project, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5_1
[6]  
Baumert J., 2013, Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers: Results from the COACTIV Project, P25, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4614, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5_2, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-52]
[7]   Teachers' Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress [J].
Baumert, Juergen ;
Kunter, Mareike ;
Blum, Werner ;
Brunner, Martin ;
Voss, Thamar ;
Jordan, Alexander ;
Klusmann, Uta ;
Krauss, Stefan ;
Neubrand, Michael ;
Tsai, Yi-Miau .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2010, 47 (01) :133-180
[8]  
Becker B.J., 2000, Handbook of applied and multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling, P499, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-012691360-6/50018-5
[9]  
Bednarz N., 2009, Learn. Mathem, V29, P11
[10]   Who participates in which type of teacher professional development? Identifying and describing clusters of teachers [J].
Besser, Michael ;
Leiss, Dominik ;
Blum, Werner .
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 24 (03) :293-314