Nonlinearities and a pecking order in cross-border investment

被引:1
作者
Holland, Sara B. [1 ]
Sarkissian, Sergei [2 ]
Schill, Michael J. [3 ]
Warnock, Francis E. [4 ]
机构
[1] Washington & Lee Univ, Lexington, VA USA
[2] Canada Univ Edinburgh, McGill Univ, Fac Management, Edinburgh, Scotland
[3] Univ Virginia, Darden Business Sch, Charlottesville, VA USA
[4] Univ Virginia, Darden Business Sch, Natl Bur Econ Res, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA
关键词
Capital controls; Barriers to international investment; Market integration; HOME BIAS; QUANTILE REGRESSION; INFORMATION IMMOBILITY; EQUITY OWNERSHIP; DIVERSIFICATION; INVESTORS; MARKET; GOVERNANCE; LAW;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107250
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Nonlinearities can arise in international investment factors because of a pecking order in barriers. When direct barriers are severe, improvements in governance factors such as rule of law and expropriation risk can increase investment. Only when severe barriers are ameliorated can factors such as firm -specific information, transaction costs and hedging motives become more important. Evidence from unconditional quantile regressions provides support for a pecking order hypothesis, as we find that investment factors vary across the distribution. Specifically, our empirical results indicate that access to basic information is important everywhere, governance and familiarity matter where barriers are high, roles for information and hedging motives become more apparent where barriers are moderate, and where there are no barriers small improvements in governance have little effect on investment. Going forward, analysis should incorporate nonlinearities inherent in cross -border barriers and investment.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 68 条
[11]  
Bohn H, 1996, AM ECON REV, V86, P77
[12]   HIGHLIGHTING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CONDITIONAL AND UNCONDITIONAL QUANTILE REGRESSION APPROACHES THROUGH AN APPLICATION TO ASSESS MEDICATION ADHERENCE [J].
Borah, Bijan J. ;
Basu, Anirban .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2013, 22 (09) :1052-1070
[13]   Accounting choice, homes bias, and US investment in non-US firms [J].
Bradshaw, MT ;
Bushee, BJ ;
Miller, GS .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2004, 42 (05) :795-841
[14]   International portfolio investment flows [J].
Brennan, MJ ;
Cao, HH .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1997, 52 (05) :1851-1880
[15]   What determines the domestic bias and foreign bias? Evidence from mutual fund equity allocations worldwide [J].
Chan, K ;
Covrig, V ;
Ng, L .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2005, 60 (03) :1495-1534
[16]   Quantile regression with censoring and endogeneity [J].
Chernozhukov, Victor ;
Fernandez-Val, Ivan ;
Kowalski, Amanda E. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2015, 186 (01) :201-221
[17]   Is the Potential for International Diversification Disappearing? A Dynamic Copula Approach [J].
Christoffersen, Peter ;
Errunza, Vihang ;
Jacobs, Kris ;
Langlois, Hugues .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2012, 25 (12) :3711-3751
[18]   The separation of ownership and control in East Asian Corporations [J].
Claessens, S ;
Djankov, S ;
Lang, LHP .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 58 (1-2) :81-112
[19]   Home Bias in Open Economy Financial Macroeconomics [J].
Coeurdacier, Nicolas ;
Rey, Helene .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2013, 51 (01) :63-115
[20]   International portfolio diversification is better than you think [J].
Coeurdacier, Nicolas ;
Guibaud, Stephane .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2011, 30 (02) :289-308