Formal models in normative political theory

被引:1
作者
Chung, Hun [1 ,2 ]
Kogelmann, Brian [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Quantitat Theory & Methods, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] Waseda Univ, Fac Polit Sci & Econ, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Purdue Univ, Dept Philosophy, 100 N Univ St, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[4] Purdue Univ, Dept Polit Sci, 100 N Univ St, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
Formal models; institutional design; normative political theory; positive political theory; thought experiments; THOUGHT EXPERIMENTS; IMPOSSIBILITY; STATE;
D O I
10.1177/09516298241266267
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This article revisits the conventional distinction in political science between 'positive' and 'normative' political theory, particularly the belief that formal and mathematical methods are only pertinent to positive political theory. We argue that formal models are equally valuable in normative political theory for three reasons: they can make thought experiments more rigorous, they can demonstrate the consistency of normative principles, and they can provide insights into the practical workings of novel institutional arrangements in the absence of empirical data. The integration of formal models into normative political theory presents challenges, including the development of criteria for evaluating these models and potential shifts in research focus. Integration can also strengthen political theory's tenuous role in the political science discipline.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 274
页数:19
相关论文
共 80 条
[31]   Against Elections: The Lottocratic Alternative [J].
Guerrero, Alexander A. .
PHILOSOPHY & PUBLIC AFFAIRS, 2014, 42 (02) :135-178
[32]  
Hampton J., 1986, Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition
[33]  
Hobbes T., 2016, CITIZEN EDITED RICHA
[34]  
Hobbes T., 1994, LEVIATHAN EDITED EDW
[35]  
Ingham S, 2019, POLIT ECON I DECIS, P1, DOI 10.1017/9781108683821
[36]   Domination and democratic legislation [J].
Ingham, Sean ;
Lovett, Frank .
POLITICS PHILOSOPHY & ECONOMICS, 2022, 21 (02) :97-121
[37]   Republican Freedom, Popular Control, and Collective Action [J].
Ingham, Sean ;
Lovett, Frank .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 63 (04) :774-787
[38]   Models Among the Political Theorists [J].
Johnson, James .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 58 (03) :547-560
[39]  
Juarez-Garcia M., J MORAL PHILOS, VOnline First
[40]   Exit & isolation: Rousseau's state of nature [J].
Juarez-Garcia, Mario, I ;
Schaefer, Alexander .
SYNTHESE, 2022, 200 (03)