Formal models in normative political theory

被引:1
作者
Chung, Hun [1 ,2 ]
Kogelmann, Brian [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Quantitat Theory & Methods, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] Waseda Univ, Fac Polit Sci & Econ, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Purdue Univ, Dept Philosophy, 100 N Univ St, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[4] Purdue Univ, Dept Polit Sci, 100 N Univ St, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
Formal models; institutional design; normative political theory; positive political theory; thought experiments; THOUGHT EXPERIMENTS; IMPOSSIBILITY; STATE;
D O I
10.1177/09516298241266267
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This article revisits the conventional distinction in political science between 'positive' and 'normative' political theory, particularly the belief that formal and mathematical methods are only pertinent to positive political theory. We argue that formal models are equally valuable in normative political theory for three reasons: they can make thought experiments more rigorous, they can demonstrate the consistency of normative principles, and they can provide insights into the practical workings of novel institutional arrangements in the absence of empirical data. The integration of formal models into normative political theory presents challenges, including the development of criteria for evaluating these models and potential shifts in research focus. Integration can also strengthen political theory's tenuous role in the political science discipline.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 274
页数:19
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   (The Impossibility of) Deliberation-Consistent Social Choice [J].
Adachi, Tsuyoshi ;
Chung, Hun ;
Kurihara, Takashi .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 68 (03) :1075-1088
[2]   The Rochester school: The origins of positive political theory [J].
Amadae, SM ;
de Mesquita, BB .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1999, 2 :269-295
[3]  
Arrow KJ., 1951, SOCIAL CHOICE INDIVI
[4]   Is Maximin egalitarian? [J].
Barrett, Jacob .
SYNTHESE, 2020, 197 (02) :817-837
[5]   THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF PURE LIBERTARIANISM [J].
Braham, Matthew ;
Van Hees, Martin .
JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2014, 111 (8-9) :420-436
[6]  
Brennan J, 2016, AGAINST DEMOCRACY, P1, DOI 10.1515/9781400882939
[7]  
Brownlee K, 2017, METHODS IN ANALYTICAL POLITICAL THEORY, P21
[8]  
Brun G, 2018, ROUTL PHILOS COMPAN, P195
[9]   Locke, Nozick and the state of nature [J].
Bruner, Justin P. .
PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2020, 177 (03) :705-726
[10]   Diversity, tolerance, and the social contract [J].
Bruner, Justin P. .
POLITICS PHILOSOPHY & ECONOMICS, 2015, 14 (04) :429-448