Surrogate models for seismic response analysis of flexible rocking structures

被引:1
作者
da Silva, Andreia Horta Alvares [1 ]
Stojadinovic, Bozidar [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Struct Engn, Dept Civil Environm & Geomatic Engn, Zurich, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
flexure; rocking; sliding; surrogate model; uplift; SIMPLIFIED EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS; CANTILEVER STRUCTURE ROCKING; DYNAMIC-ANALYSIS; SYSTEMS; SIMULATION; BUILDINGS; DEMANDS; BLOCKS; DESIGN; UPLIFT;
D O I
10.1002/eqe.4193
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Seismic design tools are based on surrogate models of the designed structure and the responses of those surrogates to earthquake ground motions. To design symmetric flexible rocking structures, a surrogate model that includes rocking and flexure is needed. In this paper, we derive the equation of motion of a flexible multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) structure rocking on its base in modal coordinates. Then, we introduce a set of two-degree-of-freedom (2DOF) surrogate models that accounts only for the first elastic vibration mode of the multimass structure and its rotation about the base pivot points. We investigate the surrogates' ability to represent the dynamics of an elastic MDOF structure that uplifts and rocks and the interaction between rocking and flexure. Therein, we detail the simplifications for the equations of motion of the 2DOF surrogate models and the adopted rocking impact model, and develop and check the sliding initiation condition. We show that the simplified 2DOF surrogate model responses compare well to experimental results. Then we assess the 2DOF surrogate model accuracy in representing the earthquake response of the MDOF model using Cloud Analysis and the coefficient of determination R2$R<^>2$ approach. We find that simplified 2DOF surrogate of the MDOF model is quite accurate (R2=0.99$R<^>2\,=\,0.99$) in estimating its maximum relative top displacement and acceptably accurate (R2=0.90$R<^>2\,=\,0.90$) in estimating its maximum base rotation based on a thousand randomly generated flexible rocking structure earthquake response analyses. Lastly, we discuss using the simplified 2DOF surrogate model of symmetric flexible rocking structures in preliminary seismic design, and give examples featuring a continuous elastic hollow semi-conical chimney and an inelastic flexible MDOF structure, both with a base that may uplift.
引用
收藏
页码:3701 / 3725
页数:25
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Experimental Identification of the Dynamic Characteristics of a Flexible Rocking Structure [J].
Acikgoz, Sinan ;
Ma, Quincy ;
Palermo, Alessandro ;
DeJong, Matthew J. .
JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2016, 20 (08) :1199-1221
[2]   Analytical modelling of multi-mass flexible rocking structures [J].
Acikgoz, Sinan ;
DeJong, Matthew J. .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2016, 45 (13) :2103-2122
[3]   The interaction of elasticity and rocking in flexible structures allowed to uplift [J].
Acikgoz, Sinan ;
DeJong, Matthew J. .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2012, 41 (15) :2177-2194
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, version 9.7.0 (R2019b)
[5]   Dynamics of rocking podium structures [J].
Bachmann, J. A. ;
Vassiliou, M. F. ;
Stojadinovic, B. .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2017, 46 (14) :2499-2517
[6]   Analytical investigation of the seismic response of elastic oscillators placed on the top of rocking storey [J].
Bantilas, Kosmas E. ;
Kavvadias, Ioannis E. ;
Vasiliadis, Lazaros K. .
BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2021, 19 (02) :1249-1270
[7]   Seismic response of elastic multidegree of freedom oscillators placed on the top of rocking storey [J].
Bantilas, Kosmas E. ;
Kavvadias, Ioannis E. ;
Vasiliadis, Lazaros K. .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2021, 50 (05) :1315-1333
[8]  
Beck J. L., 1973, Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, V2, P343, DOI DOI 10.1002/EQE.4290020405
[9]  
Bouc R., 1967, P 4 C NONL OSC PRAG, P315
[10]  
Chopra A.K., 2000, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V16, P533, DOI DOI 10.1193/1.1586125