Increased Utilization of Low-Dose CT for Lung Cancer Screening at an Arkansas Community Oncology Clinic

被引:1
|
作者
Ellis, Edgar T. [1 ]
Bauer, Michael A. [2 ]
Beck, Thaddeus [3 ]
Bradford, Daniel S. [3 ]
Thompson, Joanna [3 ]
Holt, Abby [4 ]
Kulik, Margarete C. [5 ,6 ]
Stahr, Shelbie D. [7 ]
Hsu, Ping-Ching [7 ]
Su, L. Joseph [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Fay W Boozman Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Little Rock, AR USA
[2] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Coll Med, Dept Biomed Informat, Little Rock, AR USA
[3] Highlands Oncol, Fayetteville, AR USA
[4] ICF Int Inc, Fairfax, VA USA
[5] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Fay W Boozman Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav & Hlth Educ, Little Rock, AR USA
[6] Univ Calif Off President, Tobacco Related Dis Res Program, Oakland, CA USA
[7] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Fay W Boozman Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Environm & Occupat Hlth, Little Rock, AR USA
[8] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Peter ODonnell Jr Sch Publ Hlth, Acad Affairs, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[9] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Peter ODonnell Jr Sch Publ Hlth, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd,Florence Bldg E5 506X,Mail C, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
LDCT; lung cancer; rural; screening; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacr.2023.09.015
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Low-dose CT (LDCT) is underused in Arkansas for lung cancer screening, a rural state with a high incidence of lung cancer. The objective was to determine whether offering free LDCT increased the number of high-risk individuals screened in a rural catchment area. Methods: There were 5,402 patients enrolled in screening at Highlands Oncology, a community oncology clinic in Northwest Arkansas, from 2013 to 2020. Screenings were separated into time periods: period 1 (10 months for-fee), period 2 (10 months free with targeted advertisements and primary care outreach), and period 3 (62 months free with only primary care outreach). In all, 5,035 highrisk participants were eligible for analysis based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Enrollment rates, incidence densities (IDs), Cox proportional hazard models, and Kaplan -Meier curves were performed to investigate differences between enrollment periods and high-risk groups. Results: Patient volume increased drastically once screenings were offered free of charge (period 1 = 4.6 versus period 2 = 66.0 and period 3 = 69.8 average patients per month). Incidence density per 1,000 person-years increased through each period (IDPeriod 1 = 17.2; IDPeriod 2 = 20.8; IDPeriod 3 = 25.5 cases). Cox models revealed significant differences in lung cancer risk between high-risk groups (P = .012) but not enrollment periods (P = .19). Kaplan -Meier lung cancer -free probabilities differed significantly between highrisk groups (log-rank P = .00068) but not enrollment periods (log-rank P = .18). Conclusions: This study suggests that eligible patients are more receptive to free LDCT screening, despite most insurances not having a required copay for eligible patients.
引用
收藏
页码:858 / 866
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT: a Meta-Analysis
    Hoffman, Richard M.
    Atallah, Rami P.
    Struble, Roger D.
    Badgett, Robert G.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (10) : 3015 - 3025
  • [42] Performance of lung cancer screening with low-dose CT in Gejiu, Yunnan: A population-based, screening cohort study
    Wei, Meng-Na
    Su, Zheng
    Wang, Jian-Ning
    Mendez, Maria J.
    Yu, Xiao-Yun
    Liang, Hao
    Zhou, Qing-Hua
    Fan, Ya-Guang
    Qiao, You-Lin
    THORACIC CANCER, 2020, 11 (05) : 1224 - 1232
  • [43] Lung Cancer Screening: Adjuncts and Alternatives to Low-Dose CT Scans
    Sanchez, Rolando Sanchez
    Tanner, Nichole T.
    Siddiqi, Nasar A.
    Silvestri, Gerard A.
    CURRENT SURGERY REPORTS, 2013, 1 (04): : 249 - 256
  • [44] Delivering low-dose CT screening for lung cancer: a pragmatic approach
    Horst, Carolyn
    Dickson, Jennifer L.
    Tisi, Sophie
    Ruparel, Mamta
    Nair, Arjun
    Devaraj, Anand
    Janes, Sam M.
    THORAX, 2020, 75 (10) : 831 - 832
  • [45] Lung Cancer Screening: Adjuncts and Alternatives to Low-Dose CT Scans
    Rolando Sanchez Sanchez
    Nichole T. Tanner
    Nasar A. Siddiqi
    Gerard A. Silvestri
    Current Surgery Reports, 2013, 1 (4) : 249 - 256
  • [46] Use and Outcomes of Low-Dose CT Scan Lung Cancer Screening in the Medicare Population
    Pinsky, Paul F.
    Miller, Eric
    CHEST, 2022, 162 (03) : 721 - 729
  • [47] Lung cancer screening with low-dose thoracic CT-scan in the Somme area
    Leleu, O.
    Auquier, M.
    Carre, O.
    Chauffert, B.
    Dubreuil, A.
    Petigny, V.
    Trancart, B.
    Berna, P.
    Jounieaux, V.
    REVUE DES MALADIES RESPIRATOIRES, 2017, 34 (03) : 262 - 267
  • [48] Spectrum of early lung cancer presentation in low-dose screening CT: a pictorial review
    Rampinelli C.
    Calloni S.F.
    Minotti M.
    Bellomi M.
    Insights into Imaging, 2016, 7 (3) : 449 - 459
  • [49] Use of Imaging and Diagnostic Procedures After Low-Dose CT Screening for Lung Cancer
    Nishi, Shawn P. E.
    Zhou, Jie
    Okereke, Ikenna
    Kuo, Yong-Fang
    Goodwin, James
    CHEST, 2020, 157 (02) : 427 - 434
  • [50] Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose Computed Tomography
    Chiles, Caroline
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 52 (01) : 27 - +