Increased Utilization of Low-Dose CT for Lung Cancer Screening at an Arkansas Community Oncology Clinic

被引:1
|
作者
Ellis, Edgar T. [1 ]
Bauer, Michael A. [2 ]
Beck, Thaddeus [3 ]
Bradford, Daniel S. [3 ]
Thompson, Joanna [3 ]
Holt, Abby [4 ]
Kulik, Margarete C. [5 ,6 ]
Stahr, Shelbie D. [7 ]
Hsu, Ping-Ching [7 ]
Su, L. Joseph [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Fay W Boozman Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Little Rock, AR USA
[2] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Coll Med, Dept Biomed Informat, Little Rock, AR USA
[3] Highlands Oncol, Fayetteville, AR USA
[4] ICF Int Inc, Fairfax, VA USA
[5] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Fay W Boozman Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav & Hlth Educ, Little Rock, AR USA
[6] Univ Calif Off President, Tobacco Related Dis Res Program, Oakland, CA USA
[7] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Fay W Boozman Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Environm & Occupat Hlth, Little Rock, AR USA
[8] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Peter ODonnell Jr Sch Publ Hlth, Acad Affairs, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[9] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Peter ODonnell Jr Sch Publ Hlth, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd,Florence Bldg E5 506X,Mail C, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
LDCT; lung cancer; rural; screening; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacr.2023.09.015
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Low-dose CT (LDCT) is underused in Arkansas for lung cancer screening, a rural state with a high incidence of lung cancer. The objective was to determine whether offering free LDCT increased the number of high-risk individuals screened in a rural catchment area. Methods: There were 5,402 patients enrolled in screening at Highlands Oncology, a community oncology clinic in Northwest Arkansas, from 2013 to 2020. Screenings were separated into time periods: period 1 (10 months for-fee), period 2 (10 months free with targeted advertisements and primary care outreach), and period 3 (62 months free with only primary care outreach). In all, 5,035 highrisk participants were eligible for analysis based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Enrollment rates, incidence densities (IDs), Cox proportional hazard models, and Kaplan -Meier curves were performed to investigate differences between enrollment periods and high-risk groups. Results: Patient volume increased drastically once screenings were offered free of charge (period 1 = 4.6 versus period 2 = 66.0 and period 3 = 69.8 average patients per month). Incidence density per 1,000 person-years increased through each period (IDPeriod 1 = 17.2; IDPeriod 2 = 20.8; IDPeriod 3 = 25.5 cases). Cox models revealed significant differences in lung cancer risk between high-risk groups (P = .012) but not enrollment periods (P = .19). Kaplan -Meier lung cancer -free probabilities differed significantly between highrisk groups (log-rank P = .00068) but not enrollment periods (log-rank P = .18). Conclusions: This study suggests that eligible patients are more receptive to free LDCT screening, despite most insurances not having a required copay for eligible patients.
引用
收藏
页码:858 / 866
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Community Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Lam, Vincent K.
    Miller, Mary
    Dowling, Lynn
    Singhal, Shyamali
    Young, Robert P.
    Cabebe, Elwyn C.
    LUNG, 2015, 193 (01) : 135 - 139
  • [2] Appropriate screening intervals in low-dose CT lung cancer screening
    Heuvelmans, Marjolein A.
    Oudkerk, Matthijs
    TRANSLATIONAL LUNG CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 7 (03) : 281 - 287
  • [3] Hesitancy around low-dose CT screening for lung cancer
    Dickson, J. L.
    Horst, C.
    Nair, A.
    Tisi, S.
    Prendecki, R.
    Janes, S. M.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 (01) : 34 - 41
  • [4] Community Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Vincent K. Lam
    Mary Miller
    Lynn Dowling
    Shyamali Singhal
    Robert P. Young
    Elwyn C. Cabebe
    Lung, 2015, 193 : 135 - 139
  • [5] Multidisciplinary approach to low-dose CT screening for lung cancer in a metropolitan community
    Shields, Lisa B. E.
    Barnes, Jessica G. Wilkett
    Buckley, Connie
    Mikos, George J.
    Rogers, Katie N.
    Hamm, John T.
    Flynn, Joseph M.
    Hester, Steven T.
    Honaker, Joshua T.
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2020, 37 (01) : 25 - 29
  • [6] Screening for Lung Cancer with Low-Dose CT Scans
    Jett, James R.
    EURASIAN JOURNAL OF PULMONOLOGY, 2014, 16 (02) : 59 - 62
  • [7] Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT: Baseline Screening Results in Shanghai
    Fan, Li
    Wang, Yun
    Zhou, Ying
    Li, Qiong
    Yang, Wenjie
    Wang, Shengping
    Shan, Fei
    Zhang, Xingwei
    Shi, Jingyun
    Chen, Wufei
    Liu, Shi-Yuan
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (10) : 1283 - 1291
  • [8] Lung cancer screening with low-dose CT
    Diederich, S
    Wormanns, D
    Heindel, W
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2003, 45 (01) : 2 - 7
  • [9] Low-dose CT for lung cancer screening: opportunities and challenges
    Shen, Hongbing
    FRONTIERS OF MEDICINE, 2018, 12 (01) : 116 - 121
  • [10] First experiences with HUNCHEST - low-dose CT lung cancer screening programme
    Anna, Kerpel-Fronius
    Zsuzsanna, Monostori
    Diana, Solymosi
    Zsolt, Markoczy
    Livia, Rojko
    Gabor, Kovacs
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2018, 159 (43) : 1741 - 1746