Comment on papers using machine learning for significant wave height time series prediction: Complex models do not outperform auto-regression

被引:6
作者
Jiang, Haoyu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Yuan [1 ]
Qian, Chengcheng [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Wang, Xuan [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Hubei Key Lab Marine Geol Resources, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Qingdao Natl Lab Marine Sci & Technol, Lab Reg Oceanog & Numer Modeling, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[3] China Univ Geosci, Shenzhen Res Inst, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[4] State Ocean Adm, Dept Informat & Files, North China Sea Marine Forecasting Ctr, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[5] Weifang Univ, Sch Phys & Elect Informat, Weifang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Significant wave height; Time series prediction; Machine learning; Deep learning;
D O I
10.1016/j.ocemod.2024.102364
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Significant Wave Height (SWH) is crucial in many aspect of ocean engineering. The accurate prediction of SWH has therefore been of immense practical value. Recently, Artificial Intelligence (AI) time series prediction methods have been widely used for single-point short-term SWH time-series forecasting, resulting in many AIbased models claiming to achieve good results. However, the extent to which these complex AI models can outperform traditional methods has largely been overlooked. This study compared five different models AutoRegressive (AR), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and WaveNet - for their performance on SWH time series prediction at 16 buoy locations. Surprisingly, the results suggest that the differences of performance among different models are negligible, indicating that all these AI models have only "learned" the linear auto-regression from the data. Additionally, we noticed that many recent studies used signal decomposition method for such time series prediction, and most of them decomposed the test sets, which is WRONG.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   A global wave parameter database for geophysical applications. Part 3: Improved forcing and spectral resolution [J].
Alday, Matias ;
Accensi, Mickael ;
Ardhuin, Fabrice ;
Dodet, Guillaume .
OCEAN MODELLING, 2021, 166
[2]   Hourly significant wave height prediction via singular spectrum analysis and wavelet transform based models [J].
Altunkaynak, Abdusselam ;
Celik, Anil ;
Mandev, Murat Baris .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2023, 281
[3]  
Booij N., 1996, PROC 25 INT C COASTA, V1, P668, DOI DOI 10.1061/9780784402429.053
[4]   Wave modelling - The state of the art [J].
Cavaleri, L. ;
Alves, J. -H. G. M. ;
Ardhuin, F. ;
Babanin, A. ;
Banner, M. ;
Belibassakis, K. ;
Benoit, M. ;
Donelan, M. ;
Groeneweg, J. ;
Herbers, T. H. C. ;
Hwang, P. ;
Janssen, P. A. E. M. ;
Janssen, T. ;
Lavrenov, I. V. ;
Magne, R. ;
Monbaliu, J. ;
Onorato, M. ;
Polnikov, V. ;
Resio, D. ;
Rogers, W. E. ;
Sheremet, A. ;
Smith, J. Mckee ;
Tolman, H. L. ;
van Vledder, G. ;
Wolf, J. ;
Young, I. .
PROGRESS IN OCEANOGRAPHY, 2007, 75 (04) :603-674
[5]   Improving prediction performance of significant wave height via hybrid SVD-Fuzzy model [J].
Celik, Anil .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2022, 266
[6]   Significant wave height prediction through artificial intelligent mode decomposition for wave energy management [J].
Chen, Yaoran ;
Zhang, Dan ;
Li, Xiaowei ;
Peng, Yan ;
Wu, Chuhan ;
Pu, Huayan ;
Zhou, Dai ;
Cao, Yong ;
Zhang, Jiujun .
ENERGY AND AI, 2023, 14
[7]  
Deo MC, 1999, OCEAN ENG, V26, P191
[8]   Regional forecasting of significant wave height and mean wave period using EOF-EEMD-SCINet hybrid model [J].
Ding, Jie ;
Deng, Fangyu ;
Liu, Qi ;
Wang, Jichao .
APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH, 2023, 136
[9]   A novel model to predict significant wave height based on long short-term memory network [J].
Fan, Shuntao ;
Xiao, Nianhao ;
Dong, Sheng .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2020, 205
[10]   Prediction of Significant Wave Height in Offshore China Based on the Machine Learning Method [J].
Feng, Zhijie ;
Hu, Po ;
Li, Shuiqing ;
Mo, Dongxue .
JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (06)