Post-trial monitoring of a randomised controlled trial of intensive glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes extended from 10 years to 24 years (UKPDS 91)

被引:31
作者
Adler, Amanda, I [1 ,2 ]
Coleman, Ruth L. [1 ,2 ]
Leal, Jose [2 ,3 ]
Whiteley, William N. [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Clarke, Philip [2 ,3 ]
Holman, Rury R. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Radcliffe Dept Med, Diabet Trials Unit, Oxford, England
[2] NIHR Oxford Biomed Res Ctr, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Hlth Econ Res Ctr, Oxford, England
[4] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Clin Brain Sci, Edinburgh, Scotland
[5] Univ Edinburgh, Usher Inst Populat Hlth Sci & Informat, Edinburgh, Scotland
[6] Hlth Data Res UK, British Heart Fdn, Data Sci Ctr, London, England
[7] Churchill Hosp, Diabet Trials Unit, OCDEM, Oxford OX3 7LJ, England
关键词
MULTIFACTORIAL INTERVENTION; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; BLOOD-PRESSURE; FOLLOW-UP; MORTALITY; GLUCOSE;
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00537-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The 20-year UK Prospective Diabetes Study showed major clinical benefits for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes randomly allocated to intensive glycaemic control with sulfonylurea or insulin therapy or metformin therapy, compared with conventional glycaemic control. 10-year post-trial follow-up identified enduring and emerging glycaemic and metformin legacy treatment effects. We aimed to determine whether these effects would wane by extending follow-up for another 14 years. Methods 5102 patients enrolled between 1977 and 1991, of whom 4209 (82.5%) participants were originally randomly allocated to receive either intensive glycaemic control (sulfonylurea or insulin, or if overweight, metformin) or conventional glycaemic control (primarily diet). At the end of the 20-year interventional trial, 3277 surviving participants entered a 10-year post-trial monitoring period, which ran until Sept 30, 2007. Eligible participants for this study were all surviving participants at the end of the 10-year post-trial monitoring period. An extended follow-up of these participants was done by linking them to their routinely collected National Health Service (NHS) data for another 14 years. Clinical outcomes were derived from records of deaths, hospital admissions, outpatient visits, and accident and emergency unit attendances. We examined seven prespecified aggregate clinical outcomes (ie, any diabetes-related endpoint, diabetes-related death, death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, and microvascular disease) by the randomised glycaemic control strategy on an intention-to-treat basis using Kaplan-Meier time-to-event and log-rank analyses. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN75451837. Findings Between Oct 1, 2007, and Sept 30, 2021, 1489 (97.6%) of 1525 participants could be linked to routinely collected NHS administrative data. Their mean age at baseline was 50.2 years (SD 8.0), and 41.3% were female. The mean age of those still alive as of Sept 30, 2021, was 79.9 years (SD 8.0). Individual follow-up from baseline ranged from 0 to 42 years, median 17.5 years (IQR 12.3-26.8). Overall follow-up increased by 21%, from 66 972 to 80 724 person-years. For up to 24 years after trial end, the glycaemic and metformin legacy effects showed no sign of waning. Early intensive glycaemic control with sulfonylurea or insulin therapy, compared with conventional glycaemic control, showed overall relative risk reductions of 10% (95% CI 2-17; p=0.015) for death from any cause, 17% (6-26; p=0.002) for myocardial infarction, and 26% (14-36; p<0.0001) for microvascular disease. Corresponding absolute risk reductions were 2.7%, 3.3%, and 3.5%, respectively. Early intensive glycaemic control with metformin therapy, compared with conventional glycaemic control, showed overall relative risk reductions of 20% (95% CI 5-32; p=0.010) for death from any cause and 31% (12-46; p=0.003) for myocardial infarction. Corresponding absolute risk reductions were 4.9% and 6.2%, respectively. No significant risk reductions during or after the trial for stroke or peripheral vascular disease were observed for both intensive glycaemic control groups, and no significant risk reduction for microvascular disease was observed for metformin therapy. Interpretation Early intensive glycaemic control with sulfonylurea or insulin, or with metformin, compared with conventional glycaemic control, appears to confer a near-lifelong reduced risk of death and myocardial infarction. Achieving near normoglycaemia immediately following diagnosis might be essential to minimise the lifetime risk of diabetes-related complications to the greatest extent possible. Copyright (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC-BY 4.0 license.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 155
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Introduction to the Analysis of Survival Data in the Presence of Competing Risks
    Austin, Peter C.
    Lee, Douglas S.
    Fine, Jason P.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2016, 133 (06) : 601 - 609
  • [2] Metformin: A Novel Weapon Against Inflammation
    Bai, Bo
    Chen, Haibo
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [3] Cardiovascular Risk Reduction With Liraglutide: An Exploratory Mediation Analysis of the LEADER Trial
    Buse, John B.
    Bain, Stephen C.
    Mann, Johannes F. E.
    Nauck, Michael A.
    Nissen, Steven E.
    Pocock, Stuart
    Poulter, Neil R.
    Pratley, Richard E.
    Linder, Martin
    Monk Fries, Tea
    Orsted, David D.
    Zinman, Bernard
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2020, 43 (07) : 1546 - 1552
  • [4] Cost-utility analyses of intensive blood glucose and tight blood pressure control in type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 72)
    Clarke, PM
    Gray, AM
    Briggs, A
    Stevens, RJ
    Matthews, DR
    Holman, RR
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2005, 48 (05) : 868 - 877
  • [5] Can the cardiovascular risk reductions observed with empagliflozin in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial be explained by concomitant changes seen in conventional cardiovascular risk factor levels?
    Coleman, Ruth L.
    Gray, Alastair M.
    Broedl, Uli C.
    Fitchett, David
    George, Jyothis T.
    Woerle, Hans J.
    Zinman, Bernard
    Holman, Rury R.
    [J]. DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2020, 22 (07) : 1151 - 1156
  • [6] Mediators of the improvement in heart failure outcomes with empagliflozin in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial
    Fitchett, David
    Inzucchi, Silvio E.
    Zinman, Bernard
    Wanner, Christoph
    Schumacher, Martin
    Schmoor, Claudia
    Ohneberg, Kristin
    Ofstad, Anne Pernille
    Salsali, Afshin
    George, Jyothis T.
    Hantel, Stefan
    Bluhmki, Erich
    Lachin, John M.
    Zannad, Faiez
    [J]. ESC HEART FAILURE, 2021, 8 (06): : 4517 - 4527
  • [7] Assessment of Long-term Follow-up of Randomized Trial Participants by Linkage to Routinely Collected Data A Scoping Review and Analysis
    Fitzpatrick, Tiffany
    Perrier, Laure
    Shakik, Sharara
    Cairncross, Zoe
    Tricco, Andrea C.
    Lix, Lisa
    Zwarenstein, Merrick
    Rosella, Laura
    Henry, David
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2018, 1 (08)
  • [8] Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes
    Gaede, P
    Vedel, P
    Larsen, N
    Jensen, GVH
    Parving, H
    Pedersen, O
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 348 (05) : 383 - 393
  • [9] Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes
    Gaede, Peter
    Lund-Andersen, Henrik
    Parving, Hans-Henrik
    Pedersen, Oluf
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 358 (06) : 580 - 591
  • [10] Comparison of the Accuracy and Completeness of Records of Serious Vascular Events in Routinely Collected Data vs Clinical Trial-Adjudicated Direct Follow-up Data in the UK Secondary Analysis of the ASCEND Randomized Clinical Trial
    Harper, Charlie
    Mafham, Marion
    Herrington, William
    Staplin, Natalie
    Stevens, William
    Wallendszus, Karl
    Haynes, Richard
    Landray, Martin J.
    Parish, Sarah
    Bowman, Louise
    Armitage, Jane
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (12)