Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction as a Promising Alternative for Minilaparotomy in Bowel Resection Due to Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:0
作者
Kar, Emre [1 ]
Philip, Chris Elizabeth [2 ]
Eskandar, Karine [3 ]
Polat, Ibrahim [1 ]
Bastu, Ercan [4 ]
机构
[1] Basaksehir Cam & Sakura City Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, G-434 St 2L,Block D,Floor 3, TR-34480 Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Beaumont Hosp, Dept Gynecol, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Pontif Catholic Univ Parana, Dept Med, Curitiba, Brazil
[4] Nesta Clin, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Colectomy; Laparoscopy; Deep Infiltrative Endometriosis; Transanal; Transvaginal; DEEP INFILTRATING ENDOMETRIOSIS; LAPAROSCOPIC TREATMENT; RECTAL ENDOMETRIOSIS; SEGMENTAL RESECTION; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; SURGERY; COLECTOMY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPLICATIONS; COHORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2024.04.017
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: This study focuses on evaluating the effectiveness, safety and efficacy of 2 surgical tissue extraction methods for treating bowel endometriosis: natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) and minilaparotomy. Data Sources: A systematic search was conducted in MedLine, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases in October 2023, without date restrictions. Methods of Study Selection: This study included studies that directly compared NOSE and minilaparotomy in colectomy patients due to endometriosis. Primary outcomes were defined as operation duration, length of hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, and major postoperative complication rates. The Clavien-Dindo classification was used to categorize complications. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager Software by Cochrane, with a DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model to account for anticipated high heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis was conducted for patients undergoing full laparoscopic (L/S) resection. Tabulation, Integration and Results: Out of 1236 identified studies, 6 met the inclusion criteria, comprising 372 patients. One study was a randomized controlled trial, and 5 were observational. Operation duration did not significantly differ between NOSE and minilaparotomy (MD:- 10.85 min; 95% CI: [- 23.33, 1.63]; p = .09). NOSE was associated with a significantly reduced length of hospital stay (MD:- 0.76 day; 95% CI: [- 1.21,- 0.31]; p = .008). The major postoperative complication rates were 3.77% for NOSE and 5.55% for minilaparotomy, with no significant difference (OR: 0.84; 95% CI: [0.27, 2.60]; p = .76). Subgroup analysis revealed that Full L/S had significantly shorter operation duration (MD:- 26.06 min; 95% CI: [- 45.85,- 6.27]; p = .01), reduced length of stay (MD:- 0.75 day; 95% CI: [- 1.25,- 0.25]; p = .003), and lower blood loss (MD:- 15.01 mL; 95% CI: [- 29.64,- 0.37]; p = .04). Conclusion: NOSE emerged as a potentially safer alternative to minilaparotomy for tissue extraction in colectomy for bowel endometriosis. However, standardization of the procedure and additional randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (2024) 31, 574 - 583. (c) 2024 AAGL. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:574 / 583.e1
页数:11
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Treatment of rectosigmoid endometriosis by laparoscopically assisted vaginal rectosigmoidectomy
    Abrao, MS
    Sagae, UE
    Gonzales, M
    Podgaec, S
    Dias, JA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2005, 91 (01) : 27 - 31
  • [2] Totally Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Anastomosis With Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction (NOSE) Techniques, Particularly Suitable for Bowel Endometriosis
    Akladios, Cherif
    Faller, Emilie
    Afors, Karolina
    Puga, Marco
    Albornoz, Jaime
    Redondo, Christina
    Leroy, Joel
    Wattiez, Arnaud
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 21 (06) : 1095 - 1102
  • [3] Albornoz J, 2012, J Minimally Invasive Gynecol, V19, pS51
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2020, Review Manager (RevMan) Computer program
  • [5] Outcome after surgery for deep endometriosis in filtrating the rectum
    Bafort, Celine
    van Elst, Barbara
    Neutens, Sofie
    Meuleman, Christel
    Laenen, Annouschka
    d'Hoore, Andre
    Wolthuis, Albert
    Tomassetti, Carla
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 113 (06) : 1319 - +
  • [6] ESHRE guideline: endometriosis
    Becker, Christian M.
    Bokor, Attila
    Heikinheimo, Oskari
    Horne, Andrew
    Jansen, Femke
    Kiesel, Ludwig
    King, Kathleen
    Kvaskoff, Marina
    Nap, Annemiek
    Petersen, Katrine
    Saridogan, Ertan
    Tomassetti, Carla
    van Hanegem, Nehalennia
    Vulliemoz, Nicolas
    Vermeulen, Nathalie
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION OPEN, 2022, 2022 (02)
  • [7] Surgical Outcomes after Colorectal Surgery for Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Bendifallah, Sofiane
    Puchar, Anne
    Vesale, Elie
    Moawad, Gaby
    Darai, Emile
    Roman, Horace
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (03) : 453 - 466
  • [8] Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction during Laparoscopic Bowel Resection for Colorectal Endometriosis: Technique and Outcome
    Bokor, Attila
    Lukovich, Peter
    Csibi, Noemi
    D'Hooghe, Thomas
    Lebovic, Dan
    Brubel, Reka
    Rigo, Janos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 25 (06) : 1065 - 1074
  • [9] Laparoscopic colorectal resections with transvaginal specimen extraction for severe endometriosis
    Boni, L.
    Tenconi, S.
    Beretta, P.
    Cromi, A.
    Dionigi, G.
    Rovera, F.
    Dionigi, R.
    Ghezzi, F.
    [J]. SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2007, 16 : S157 - S160
  • [10] Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis
    Burney, Richard O.
    Giudice, Linda C.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2012, 98 (03) : 511 - 519