Retention of Mandibular Complete Overdentures using Mini Dental lmplants (∅<3 mm) and Standard Diameter lmplants (∅>3mm): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

被引:2
作者
Aljudaibia, Suha Mohammed [1 ]
Alqhtanib, Mohammad Abdullah Zayed [2 ]
Almesletc, Asmaa Saleh [3 ]
Aldowahd, Omir [2 ]
Alhendie, Khalid Dhafer S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Prevent Dent Sci, POB 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
[2] Najran Univ, Fac Dent, Prosthet Dent Sci Dept, Najran 66462, Saudi Arabia
[3] Riyadh Elm Univ, Coll Med & Dent, Dept Oral Maxillofacial Surg & Diagnost Sci, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
edentulous; implant survival rate; mandible; mini dental implants; overdenture; standard-diameter implants; IMMEDIATELY LOADED IMPLANTS; RISK-FACTOR; OUTCOMES; HEALTH;
D O I
10.3290/j.ohpd.b5282167
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The objective of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which assessed the efficacy of mini dental implants (MDIs) and standard-diameter implants (SDIs) in retaining Materials and Methods: The focused question was "Is there a difference in the mechanical stability between MDIs and SDIs in retaining MO?" Indexed databases were searched up to and including November 2023 using different keywords. Boolean operators were used during the search. The literature was searched in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The PICO characteristics were: patients (P)=individuals with complete mandibular dentures requiring dental implants; Intervention (I)=placement of MDIs under mandibular dentures; Control (C)=placement of SDIs under mandibular dentures; Outcome (O)=comparison of stability between MDIs and SDIs in supporting mandibular dentures. Only RCTs were included. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB tool. Results: Five RCTs were included. The numbers of participants ranged between 45 and 120 edentulous individuals wearing complete mandibular dentures. The mean age of patients ranged between 59.5 +/- 8.5 and 68.3 +/- 8.5years. The number of MDIs and SDIs ranged between 22 and 152 and 10 and 80 implants, respectively. The follow-up duration ranged between one week and 12 months. Three RCTs reported an improvement in the quality of life (QoL) of all patients after stabilisation of mandibular dentures using MDIs or SDIs. In one RCT, peri-implant soft tissue profiles were comparable between MDIs and SDIs at the 1-year follow-up. The implant survival rate was reported in two RCTs, which were from 89% to 98% and 99% to 100% for MDIs and SDIs, respectively. All RCTs had a low RoB. Conclusion: Mini dental implants represent a viable alternative to traditional standard-diameter implants when seeking optimal retention for mandibular overdentures.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 188
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Is a two-step impression mandatory for complete denture fabrication on the severely resorbed mandible? A randomized trial on patient perception and denture quality [J].
Albuquerque, Ivo S. ;
Regis, Romulo R. ;
Souza, Raphael F. de ;
Gurgel, Kelvin F. ;
Silva, Paulo G. B. ;
Pinto-Fiamengui, Livia M. S. ;
Freitas-Pontes, Karina M. .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2020, 98
[2]   A Clinical Evaluation Denture Adhesives Used by Patients With Xerostomia [J].
Bogucki, Zdzislaw A. ;
Napadlek, Piotr ;
Dabrowa, Tomasz .
MEDICINE, 2015, 94 (07) :e545
[3]   Sample size estimation for health and social science researchers: The principles and considerations for different study designs [J].
Bolarinwa, Oladimeji Akeem .
NIGERIAN POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 27 (02) :67-75
[4]  
Bulard Ronald A, 2005, Compend Contin Educ Dent, V26, P892
[5]   Clinical Outcomes of Three versus Four Mini-Implants Retaining Mandibular Overdenture: A 5-Year Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Celebic, Asja ;
Kovacic, Ines ;
Petricevic, Nikola ;
Alhajj, Mohammed Nasser ;
Topic, Jolanda ;
Junakovic, Luka ;
Persic-Kirsic, Sanja .
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2024, 60 (01)
[6]   Soft tissue-related complications and management around dental implants [J].
Chackartchi, Tali ;
Romanos, Georgios E. ;
Sculean, Anton .
PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2019, 81 (01) :124-138
[7]   Mini vs. Standard Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Trial [J].
de Souza, R. F. ;
Ribeiro, A. B. ;
Della Vecchia, M. P. ;
Costa, L. ;
Cunha, T. R. ;
Reis, A. C. ;
Albuquerque, R. F., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2015, 94 (10) :1376-1384
[8]  
Della Vecchia M P, 2018, JDR Clin Trans Res, V3, P47, DOI 10.1177/2380084417741446
[9]   Mini-Implants in Dentistry – A Review [J].
Duraisamy R. ;
Ganapathy D.M. ;
Rajeshkumar S. ;
Ashok V. .
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, 2022, 32 (03) :29-37
[10]   Rationale for Mini Dental Implant Treatment [J].
Flanagan, Dennis .
JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2021, 47 (05) :437-444