Curriculum Decision-Making for Students with Severe Intellectual Disabilities or Profound and Multiple Learning Difficulties
被引:2
作者:
Rendoth, Tess
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Newcastle, Coll Human & Social Futures, Sch Educ, Callaghan, NSW, AustraliaUniv Newcastle, Coll Human & Social Futures, Sch Educ, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
Rendoth, Tess
[1
]
Foggett, Judith
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Newcastle, Coll Human & Social Futures, Sch Educ, Callaghan, NSW, AustraliaUniv Newcastle, Coll Human & Social Futures, Sch Educ, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
Foggett, Judith
[1
]
Duncan, Jill
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Newcastle, Coll Human & Social Futures, Sch Educ, Callaghan, NSW, AustraliaUniv Newcastle, Coll Human & Social Futures, Sch Educ, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
Duncan, Jill
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Newcastle, Coll Human & Social Futures, Sch Educ, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
Curriculum;
decision-making;
teacher;
students with severe intellectual disabilities;
students with profound disabilities;
students with multiple learning difficulties;
TEACHERS DECISIONS;
PERSPECTIVES;
CHALLENGES;
LITERACY;
CHILDREN;
D O I:
10.1080/1034912X.2024.2378015
中图分类号:
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号:
040109 ;
摘要:
Students with severe intellectual disabilities or profound and multiple learning difficulties (S/PMLD) have the highest complexity of needs of any student cohort. Decisions regarding curriculum inclusions for these students predominantly fall to their classroom teachers. These decisions directly correlate with students' everyday learning experiences and have an influence on their life-long socio-economic, health, and well-being outcomes. This scoping review presents an overview of the factors that teachers consider when making these important choices. Online databases were used to identify peer-reviewed research undertaken internationally between 2011 and 2021 with 11 articles identified for inclusion. Results are presented using four key themes, (1) teacher as guardian, (2) teacher as educator, (3) teacher as employee and (4) teacher as (non)academic. Within, it details a paucity of research into understanding the decision-making schema of teachers of students with S/PMLD, revealing a lack of practical guidance or appropriate professional learning opportunities. Recommendations for future research and practice initiatives are detailed.