Curriculum Decision-Making for Students with Severe Intellectual Disabilities or Profound and Multiple Learning Difficulties

被引:0
作者
Rendoth, Tess [1 ]
Foggett, Judith [1 ]
Duncan, Jill [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Coll Human & Social Futures, Sch Educ, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
关键词
Curriculum; decision-making; teacher; students with severe intellectual disabilities; students with profound disabilities; students with multiple learning difficulties; TEACHERS DECISIONS; PERSPECTIVES; CHALLENGES; LITERACY; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1080/1034912X.2024.2378015
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Students with severe intellectual disabilities or profound and multiple learning difficulties (S/PMLD) have the highest complexity of needs of any student cohort. Decisions regarding curriculum inclusions for these students predominantly fall to their classroom teachers. These decisions directly correlate with students' everyday learning experiences and have an influence on their life-long socio-economic, health, and well-being outcomes. This scoping review presents an overview of the factors that teachers consider when making these important choices. Online databases were used to identify peer-reviewed research undertaken internationally between 2011 and 2021 with 11 articles identified for inclusion. Results are presented using four key themes, (1) teacher as guardian, (2) teacher as educator, (3) teacher as employee and (4) teacher as (non)academic. Within, it details a paucity of research into understanding the decision-making schema of teachers of students with S/PMLD, revealing a lack of practical guidance or appropriate professional learning opportunities. Recommendations for future research and practice initiatives are detailed.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Advancing methodology for scoping reviews: recommendations arising from a scoping literature review (SLR) to inform transformation of Children and Adolescent Mental Health Services
    Anderson, Joanna K.
    Howarth, Emma
    Vainre, Maris
    Humphrey, Ayla
    Jones, Peter B.
    Ford, Tamsin J.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [2] Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI [10.1080/1364557032000119616, DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
  • [3] Ayres KM, 2011, EDUC TRAIN AUTISM DE, V46, P11
  • [4] Academic or Functional Life Skills? Using Behaviors Associated with Happiness to Guide Instruction for Students with Profound/Multiple Disabilities
    Bobzien, Jonna L.
    [J]. EDUCATION RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
  • [5] Bon SC., 2011, J SCH LEADERSHIP, V21, P324, DOI DOI 10.1177/105268461102100302
  • [6] Borko H., 1990, DIMENSIONS THINKING, P311
  • [7] Braun V, 2012, APA HDB RES METHODS, P57, DOI DOI 10.1037/13620-004
  • [8] Braun V., 2013, SUCCESSFUL QUALITATI
  • [9] Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
  • [10] One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 328 - 352