Power line fault diagnosis based on convolutional neural networks

被引:2
作者
Ning, Liang [1 ]
Pei, Dongfeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Tangshan Power Supply Co, State Grid Jibei Elect Power Co Ltd, Tangshan 063000, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] State Grid Hebei Elect Power Liabil Co Hada Power, Hada 056000, Hebei, Peoples R China
关键词
CNN; Power lines; Fault location; Fault diagnosis;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29021
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
With the rapid development of the national economy, power security is very important for the security of the country and people's happiness. Electricity is an important energy source for a country. Even if the power system malfunctions for a short period of time, it would cause incalculable losses to social production and people's lives. Among them, one of the most important reasons for power system faults is the occurrence of power line faults, so diagnosing faulty lines has great research significance. On the basis of analyzing the structure and working principle of the deep learning model convolutional neural network (CNN), this article used the CNN model to diagnose faults in power lines and analyzed the simulation results. It was found that different CNN structures have different fault diagnosis accuracy for power lines. The fewer the number of batches in the network structure and the more the number of training sessions, the higher its fault determination accuracy. In the power line fault diagnosis based on three deep learning algorithms, the CNN has the highest stable fault diagnosis accuracy of 100%; the recursive neural network has the second stable fault diagnosis accuracy of 93.4%; the deep belief network has the lowest stable fault diagnosis accuracy of 91.5%. In the comparison of power line fault diagnosis stability, the accuracy standard deviation of CNN is close to 0, and they are also the most stable in power circuit fault diagnosis. The stability of algorithmic recurrent neural networks is between the two, and the accuracy standard deviation of deep belief networks is 1.84% when trained 12 times. Their fault diagnosis stability is also the worst.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Power transformers internal fault diagnosis based on deep convolutional neural networks
    Afrasiabi, Mousa
    Afrasiabi, Shahabodin
    Parang, Benyamin
    Mohammadi, Mohammad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2019, 37 (01) : 1165 - 1179
  • [2] Alexis Boneparth, 2020, Distributed Processing System, V1, P9, DOI [10.38007/DPS.2020.010102, DOI 10.38007/DPS.2020.010102]
  • [3] Amatare S.A., 2021, IOSR J. Comput. Eng., V22, P54
  • [4] RideNN: A New Rider Optimization Algorithm-Based Neural Network for Fault Diagnosis in Analog Circuits
    Binu, D.
    Kariyappa, B. S.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2019, 68 (01) : 2 - 26
  • [5] Early Tumor Diagnosis in Brain MR Images via Deep Convolutional Neural NetworkModel
    Das, Tapan Kumar
    Roy, Pradeep Kumar
    Uddin, Mohy
    Srinivasan, Kathiravan
    Chang, Chuan-Yu
    Syed-Abdul, Shabbir
    [J]. CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2021, 68 (02): : 2413 - 2429
  • [6] A DC Chopper Topology to Mitigate Commutation Failure of Line Commutated Converter Based High Voltage Direct Current Transmission
    Guo, Chunyi
    Liu, Bo
    Zhao, Chengyong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MODERN POWER SYSTEMS AND CLEAN ENERGY, 2020, 8 (02) : 345 - 355
  • [7] Development and validation of a supervised deep learning algorithm for automated whole-slide programmed death-ligand 1 tumour proportion score assessment in non-small cell lung cancer
    Hondelink, Liesbeth M.
    Huyuk, Melek
    Postmus, Pieter E.
    Smit, Vincent T. H. B. M.
    Blom, Sami
    von der Thusen, Jan H.
    Cohen, Danielle
    [J]. HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2022, 80 (04) : 635 - 647
  • [8] [金明亮 Jin Mingliang], 2019, [电力系统保护与控制, Power System Protection and Control], V47, P176
  • [9] High Accuracy Real-Time Multi-Gas Identification by a Batch-Uniform Gas Sensor Array and Deep Learning Algorithm
    Kang, Mingu
    Cho, Incheol
    Park, Jaeho
    Jeong, Jaeseok
    Lee, Kichul
    Lee, Byeongju
    Henriquez, Dionisio Del Orbe
    Yoon, Kukjin
    Park, Inkyu
    [J]. ACS SENSORS, 2022, 7 (02) : 430 - 440
  • [10] Kintali Manohar, 2021, Int. J. Innovative Technol. Explor. Eng., V9, P226