Biological pest control potential of symbiotic fungal endophytes of cool-season grasses

被引:0
|
作者
Mohammadi, Reza [1 ]
Nami, Yousef [2 ]
Tajaddod, Sadegh [1 ]
机构
[1] Agr Res Educ & Extens Org AREEO, Agr Biotechnol Res Inst Iran ABRII, Branch Northwest & West Reg, Dept Cell & Tissue Culture, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Agr Res Educ & Extens Org AREEO, Agr Biotechnol Res Inst Iran ABRII, Branch Northwest & West Reg, Dept Food Biotechnol, Tabriz, Iran
关键词
Barley aphid; Elm-grass root aphid; Fungal endophytes; Symbiosis; Tall fescue; EPICHLOE ENDOPHYTES; INFECTED TALL; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cropro.2024.106751
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Epichloe <spacing diaeresis> fungi, which are endophytic, live in symbiotic relationships with many cool-season grasses. These symbiotic relationships change the vegetative, morphological, and physiological traits of the host grasses, which helps them grow and be more resistant to different stresses. This research aimed to explore the biological control of Elm-grass root aphid ( Tetraneura ulmi ) and barley aphid ( Sipha maydis Passerini) in native Iranian tall fescue (utilized in urban green spaces as lawns) naturally infected with Epichloe <spacing diaeresis> endophytic fungi. In the free-choice assay (antixenosis), significant differences were observed between endophyte-infected (E + ) and endophytefree (E - ) clones, with aphids being attracted to E - colonies. Consequently, E + plants exhibited lower susceptibility to S. maydis compared to E - plants. Additionally, E + plants harbored significantly fewer Elm-grass root aphids than E - plants. In the no-choice assay (antibiosis), the mean comparison revealed varied growth times, with Fa 83A-E + and Fa 83A-E - treatments having the shortest (3.62 days) and longest (7.72 days) durations, respectively. Moreover, the reproduction period of aphids in Fa 83A-E + (4.92) was notably lower than Fa 83A-E - (14.60). Fa 83A-E + and Fa 83C-E + treatments had 2.30 and 2.40 nymphs per female per day, respectively, while Fa 83C-E - exhibited the highest rate at 4.0 nymphs. In summary, symbiotic fungi show promise in boosting tall fescue grass resistance to pests, offering potential biological control in urban green spaces.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] TOLERANCE OF 5 PERENNIAL COOL-SEASON GRASSES TO FLUAZIFOP
    WARREN, SL
    SKROCH, WA
    MONACO, TJ
    SHRIBBS, JM
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1989, 3 (02) : 385 - 388
  • [22] NUTRIENT CONTENT AND PHENOLOGY OF COOL-SEASON GRASSES OF PERU
    FLOREZ, A
    MALPARTIDA, E
    BRYANT, FC
    WIGGERS, EP
    GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 1985, 40 (03) : 365 - 369
  • [23] Seed maturity in four cool-season forage grasses
    Berdahl, JD
    Frank, AB
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1998, 90 (04) : 483 - 488
  • [24] PREHISTORIC AND HISTORIC ROLE OF COOL-SEASON GRASSES IN SOUTHWEST
    BOHRER, VL
    ECONOMIC BOTANY, 1975, 29 (03) : 199 - 207
  • [25] PERFORMANCE OF COOL-SEASON PERENNIAL GRASSES IN EASTERN KANSAS
    BARNETT, FL
    POSLER, GL
    FRANSEN, SC
    KANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION BULLETIN, 1978, (623): : 1 - 54
  • [26] FORAGE YIELD AND QUALITY OF WARM-SEASON AND COOL-SEASON GRASSES
    WHITE, LM
    JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1986, 39 (03): : 264 - 268
  • [27] REPRODUCTION AND DAMAGE BY RUSSIAN WHEAT APHID (HOMOPTERA, APHIDIDAE) AS INFLUENCED BY FUNGAL ENDOPHYTES AND COOL-SEASON TURFGRASSES
    KINDLER, SD
    BREEN, JP
    SPRINGER, TL
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 1991, 84 (02) : 685 - 692
  • [28] Dietary cation anion difference of five cool-season grasses
    Tremblay, GF
    Brassard, H
    Bélanger, G
    Seguin, P
    Drapeau, R
    Brégard, A
    Michaud, R
    Allard, G
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2006, 98 (02) : 339 - 348
  • [29] TOLERANCE OF 5 COOL-SEASON PERENNIAL GRASSES TO SELECTED HERBICIDES
    CANODE, CL
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1974, 66 (06) : 801 - 804
  • [30] Comparison of fall seeding dates for six cool-season grasses
    Greub, LJ
    Undersander, DJ
    AMERICAN FORAGE AND GRASSLAND COUNCIL, VOL 9, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 9 : 235 - 235