Multi-Agent Simulation to Envision Communication Strategies in Future Air Mobility Operations

被引:2
作者
Barrett, Emily [1 ]
Paladugu, Abhinay [2 ]
Ijtsma, Martijn [2 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Integrated Syst Engn, MITRE Corp Simulat Experimentat, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Integrated Syst Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE INFORMATION SYSTEMS | 2024年 / 21卷 / 08期
关键词
Air Mobility; Restricted Airspace; Electric Vertical Take off and Landing; RADAR; Aircraft Operations; Air Traffic Management System; Computational Modeling; System Architectures; Air Transportation System; Obstacle Avoidance; TEAM COMMUNICATION; PERFORMANCE; AUTOMATION; MODELS;
D O I
10.2514/1.I011239
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
In the future, low-altitude, shorter-range air operations will require support for interdependent parties, including pilots, fleet operators, and providers of traffic services, to safely and efficiently coordinate and manage shared airspace. Timely and quality communication is key to maintaining common ground between different roles, especially when dynamically cascading events require high-tempo responses. To ensure that communication is adequately supported in the design of procedures and aids, further development of the operational concepts for lower-altitude operations should account for the time and effort required for communication and consider strategies for distributing this overhead among the system's actors. This study draws from research on team cognition and communication to develop a multi-agent model of the work involved in communication. The model aims to quantify the overhead associated with communication and to dynamically evaluate alternate communication strategies in envisioned air operations. An operational scenario on contingency management in low-altitude air operations involving electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft is presented to demonstrate how the framework can support the analysis of a range of alternate strategies. The proposed approach can serve as a formative tool for designing artifacts for supporting distributed work.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 615
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Adduru V., 2019, HUMAN PERFORMANCE CO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, NASA T XXXX
[3]  
Bisantz A., 2007, Reviews of human factors and ergonomics, V3, P1
[4]   Brahms: simulating practice for work systems design [J].
Clancey, WJ ;
Sachs, P ;
Sierhuis, M ;
van Hoof, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 1998, 49 (06) :831-865
[5]   Adaptive team coordination [J].
Entin, EE ;
Serfaty, D .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1999, 41 (02) :312-325
[6]  
Espinosa A., 2004, TEAM COGNITION PROCE, P107
[7]  
FAA, 2023, UTM concept of operations version 2.0
[8]   Generic Agent Models for Simulations of Concepts of Operation: Part 2 [J].
Feigh, Karen M. ;
Pritchett, Amy R. ;
Mamessier, Sebastien ;
Gelman, Gabriel .
JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2014, 11 (10) :623-631
[9]   Climate Uniformity: Its Influence on Team Communication Quality, Task Conflict, and Team Performance [J].
Gonzalez-Roma, Vicente ;
Hernandez, Ana .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 99 (06) :1042-1058
[10]   Beyond Simon's Slice: Five Fundamental Trade-Offs that Bound the Performance of Macrocognitive Work Systems [J].
Hoffman, Robert R. ;
Woods, David D. .
IEEE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2011, 26 (06) :67-71