AI in situated action: a scoping review of ethnomethodological and conversation analytic studies

被引:4
作者
Mlynar, Jakub [1 ]
de Rijk, Lynn [2 ]
Liesenfeld, Andreas [2 ]
Stommel, Wyke [2 ]
Albert, Saul [3 ]
机构
[1] HES SO Valais Wallis Univ Appl Sci & Arts Western, Sierre, Switzerland
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Loughborough Univ, Loughborough, England
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Conversation analysis; Embodiment; Ethnomethodology; Multimodality; Robotics; Social interaction; Video analysis; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; ROBOT; DESIGN; AGENCY; REPAIR; GAZE; PLAY; INTERSUBJECTIVITY; TECHNOMETHODOLOGY; PARTICIPATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00146-024-01919-x
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Despite its elusiveness as a concept, 'artificial intelligence' (AI) is becoming part of everyday life, and a range of empirical and methodological approaches to social studies of AI now span many disciplines. This article reviews the scope of ethnomethodological and conversation analytic (EM/CA) approaches that treat AI as a phenomenon emerging in and through the situated organization of social interaction. Although this approach has been very influential in the field of computational technology since the 1980s, AI has only recently emerged as such a pervasive part of daily life to warrant a sustained empirical focus in EM/CA. Reviewing over 50 peer-reviewed publications, we find that the studies focus on various social and group activities such as task-oriented situations, semi-experimental setups, play, and everyday interactions. They also involve a range of participant categories including children, older participants, and people with disabilities. Most of the reviewed studies apply CA's conceptual apparatus, its approach to data analysis, and core topics such as turn-taking and repair. We find that across this corpus, studies center on three key themes: openings and closing the interaction, miscommunication, and non-verbal aspects of interaction. In the discussion, we reflect on EM studies that differ from those in our corpus by focusing on praxeological respecifications of AI-related phenomena. Concurrently, we offer a critical reflection on the work of literature reviewing, and explore the tortuous relationship between EM and CA in the area of research on AI.
引用
收藏
页码:1497 / 1527
页数:31
相关论文
共 239 条
[1]  
Agre Philip E., 1997, Computation and Human Experience, V1, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511571169, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511571169]
[2]  
Ala M., 2020, EVENTAL AESTHETICS, V9, P3
[3]   Social robots: Things or agents? [J].
Alac, Morana .
AI & SOCIETY, 2016, 31 (04) :519-535
[4]   When a robot is social: Spatial arrangements and multimodal semiotic engagement in the practice of social robotics [J].
Alac, Morana ;
Movellan, Javier ;
Tanaka, Fumihide .
SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 2011, 41 (06) :893-926
[5]  
Albert S, 2023, 2 TRR 318 C MEAS UND
[6]   Conversational User Interfaces in Smart Homecare Interactions: A Conversation Analytic Case Study [J].
Albert, Saul ;
Hamann, Magnus ;
Stokoe, Elizabeth .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONVERSATIONAL USER INTERFACES, CUI 2023, 2023,
[7]  
Anderson RJ, 2017, HAS ETHNOMETHO UNPUB
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1997, SOCIAL SCI TECHNICAL, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315805849
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Computers, Minds and Conduct
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1985, Social action and artificial intelligence