The effects of radar on avian behavior: Implications for wildlife management at airports

被引:10
|
作者
Sheridan, Eleanor [1 ]
Randolet, Jacquelyn [1 ]
DeVault, Travis Lee [2 ]
Seamans, Thomas Walter [2 ]
Blackvvell, Bradley Fields [2 ]
Fernandez-Juricic, Esteban [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Biol Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Wildlife Serv, USDA, Natl Wildlife Res Ctr, Sandusky, OH 44870 USA
关键词
Antipredator behavior; Aviation; Bird-aircraft collisions; Radar; Vehicle approaching; MICROWAVE-RADIATION; ELECTROMAGNETIC-FIELDS; AVOIDANCE-BEHAVIOR; PREDATOR DETECTION; ESCAPE BEHAVIOR; BIRDS; RISK; BIOLOGY; EVASION;
D O I
10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.001
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Airports often contain foraging, breeding, and roosting resources for wildlife. Airports also have different types of radars to assist with air traffic control, monitoring weather, and tracking wildlife that could become a risk for collision with aircraft. The effect of radar electromagnetic radiation on wildlife behavior is not well understood. The goal of this study was to determine whether bird behavior is affected by radar in two contexts: stationary radar (e.g., surveillance radar) and approaching radar (e.g., aircraft weather radar). We used brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) as a model species as they are common at airports. We hypothesized that radar challenges attention mechanisms and thus might distract birds from foraging or avoiding threats (i.e. aircraft). In the stationary radar context, we performed one experiment in the summer and one in the winter. In the summer, we found indication of changes in vigilance and movement behaviors during and after exposure to stationary radar. For example, movement rate increased from before to during radar exposure in the summer (t(101)=-3.21, P=0.002). In the winter, we also found that stationary radar increased movement behaviors. In the approaching radar context, we found that birds exposed to an approaching vehicle with radar showed earlier escape responses (t(56.3) = -2.66,P=0.010) or escape flights that dodged sideways more than with the radar off (t(41.5) = -2.67, P = 0.011). Taking these findings together, we suggest that birds might avoid stationary radar units, and moving radar units (e.g., aircraft) might enhance escape responses at low vehicle speeds during taxi, but likely not at higher speeds during take-off, landing, and flight. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 252
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Climate change in the United States: Implications for fish and wildlife management
    Burkett, VR
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE SIXTY-SIXTH NORTH AMERICAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL RESOURCES CONFERENCE, 2001, : 275 - 299
  • [32] Mapping Attitudes on Illegal Wildlife Trade: Implications for Management and Governance
    Arroyave, Felber
    Jenkins, Jeffrey
    Hurtado, Rafael
    CONSERVATION & SOCIETY, 2023, 21 (03): : 165 - 176
  • [33] Influence of harvesting pressure on demographic tactics: implications for wildlife management
    Servanty, Sabrina
    Gaillard, Jean-Michel
    Ronchi, Francesca
    Focardi, Stefano
    Baubet, Eric
    Gimenez, Olivier
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2011, 48 (04) : 835 - 843
  • [34] Effects of lead on learning in herring gulls: An avian wildlife model for neurobehavioral deficits
    Burger, J
    Gochfeld, M
    NEUROTOXICOLOGY, 2005, 26 (04) : 615 - 624
  • [35] Effects of lead on learning in herring gulls: An avian wildlife model of neurobehavioral developmental effects.
    Burger, J
    Gochfeld, M
    NEUROTOXICOLOGY, 2004, 25 (04) : 731 - 731
  • [36] Implications of human-wildlife conflict on the diet of an endangered avian top predator in the northern Andes
    Restrepo-Cardona, Juan Sebastian
    Kohn, Sebastian
    Renjifo, Luis Miguel
    Vasquez-Restrepo, Juan D.
    Zuluaga, Santiago
    Vargas, Felix Hernan
    Narvaez, Fabricio
    Salagaje, Luis A.
    Recalde, Abel
    Gaitan-Lopez, Erik Camilo
    Salazar, Andy
    Hull, Vanessa
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [37] Avian influenza H5N1 in viverrids: implications for wildlife health and conservation
    Roberton, S. I.
    Bell, D. J.
    Smith, G. J. D.
    Nicholls, J. M.
    Chan, K. H.
    Nguyen, D. T.
    Tran, P. Q.
    Streicher, U.
    Poon, L. L. M.
    Chen, H.
    Horby, P.
    Guardo, M.
    Guan, Y.
    Peiris, J. S. M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2006, 273 (1595) : 1729 - 1732
  • [38] Modeling the effects of environmental disturbance on wildlife communities: avian responses to prescribed fire
    Russell, Robin E.
    Royle, J. Andrew
    Saab, Victoria A.
    Lehmkuhl, John F.
    Block, William M.
    Sauer, John R.
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2009, 19 (05) : 1253 - 1263
  • [39] Field border management as a compensatory mitigation strategy in pesticide risk reduction to avian wildlife
    Kendall, RJ
    Sauls, T
    Craft, KP
    Craft, RA
    GIBIER FANE SAUVAGE - GAME AND WILDLIFE, VOL 15 (SPECIAL NUMBER PTS 2 AND 3) 1998, 1998, : 333 - 341
  • [40] A review of the effects of wildfire smoke on the health and behavior of wildlife
    Sanderfoot, O., V
    Bassing, S. B.
    Brusa, J. L.
    Emmet, R. L.
    Gillman, S. J.
    Swift, K.
    Gardner, B.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (12)