Enhancing Monthly Streamflow Prediction Using Meteorological Factors and Machine Learning Models in the Upper Colorado River Basin

被引:3
作者
Thota, Saichand [1 ]
Nassar, Ayman [2 ,3 ]
Boubrahimi, Soukaina Filali [1 ]
Hamdi, Shah Muhammad [1 ]
Hosseinzadeh, Pouya [1 ]
机构
[1] Utah State Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[2] Utah State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Utah Water Res Lab, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
streamflow prediction; machine learning; time series regression; upper Colorado river basin; RFR; snow water equivalent; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; CLIMATE; UNCERTAINTY; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.3390/hydrology11050066
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Streamflow prediction is crucial for planning future developments and safety measures along river basins, especially in the face of changing climate patterns. In this study, we utilized monthly streamflow data from the United States Bureau of Reclamation and meteorological data (snow water equivalent, temperature, and precipitation) from the various weather monitoring stations of the Snow Telemetry Network within the Upper Colorado River Basin to forecast monthly streamflow at Lees Ferry, a specific location along the Colorado River in the basin. Four machine learning models-Random Forest Regression, Long short-term memory, Gated Recurrent Unit, and Seasonal AutoRegresive Integrated Moving Average-were trained using 30 years of monthly data (1991-2020), split into 80% for training (1991-2014) and 20% for testing (2015-2020). Initially, only historical streamflow data were used for predictions, followed by including meteorological factors to assess their impact on streamflow. Subsequently, sequence analysis was conducted to explore various input-output sequence window combinations. We then evaluated the influence of each factor on streamflow by testing all possible combinations to identify the optimal feature combination for prediction. Our results indicate that the Random Forest Regression model consistently outperformed others, especially after integrating all meteorological factors with historical streamflow data. The best performance was achieved with a 24-month look-back period to predict 12 months of streamflow, yielding a Root Mean Square Error of 2.25 and R-squared (R2) of 0.80. Finally, to assess model generalizability, we tested the best model at other locations-Greenwood Springs (Colorado River), Maybell (Yampa River), and Archuleta (San Juan) in the basin.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
Adnan R.M., 2017, Civil and Environmental Research, V9, P56, DOI DOI 10.7176/CER
[2]   Groundwater Level Modeling with Machine Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Ahmadi, Arman ;
Olyaei, Mohammadali ;
Heydari, Zahra ;
Emami, Mohammad ;
Zeynolabedin, Amin ;
Ghomlaghi, Arash ;
Daccache, Andre ;
Fogg, Graham E. ;
Sadegh, Mojtaba .
WATER, 2022, 14 (06)
[3]   Random forest, support vector machine, and neural networks to modelling suspended sediment in Tigris River-Baghdad [J].
Al-Mukhtar, Mustafa .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2019, 191 (11)
[4]   Comparison between SARIMA and Holt-Winters models for forecasting monthly streamflow in the western region of Cuba [J].
Alonso Brito, Gustavo Reinel ;
Rivero Villaverde, Anaily ;
Lau Quan, Andres ;
Ruiz Perez, Maria Elena .
SN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2021, 3 (06)
[5]   Identifying Flare-indicative Photospheric Magnetic Field Parameters from Multivariate Time-series Data of Solar Active Regions [J].
Alshammari, Khaznah ;
Hamdi, Shah Muhammad ;
Filali Boubrahimi, Soukaina .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 2024, 271 (02)
[6]   Multi-time scale stream flow predictions: The support vector machines approach [J].
Asefa, T ;
Kemblowski, M ;
McKee, M ;
Khalil, A .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2006, 318 (1-4) :7-16
[7]   Temporal Rule-Based Counterfactual Explanations for Multivariate Time Series [J].
Bahri, Omar ;
Li, Peiyu ;
Boubrahimi, Soukaina Filali ;
Hamdi, Shah Muhammad .
2022 21ST IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND APPLICATIONS, ICMLA, 2022, :1244-1249
[8]  
Bahri O, 2022, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2208.10462
[9]   The Colorado River Basin Operational Prediction Testbed: A Framework for Evaluating Streamflow Forecasts and Reservoir Operations [J].
Baker, Sarah A. ;
Wood, Andy W. ;
Rajagopalan, Balaji ;
Prairie, James ;
Jerla, Carly ;
Zagona, Edith ;
Butler, Robert A. ;
Smith, Rebecca .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2022, 58 (05) :690-708
[10]   Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions [J].
Barnett, TP ;
Adam, JC ;
Lettenmaier, DP .
NATURE, 2005, 438 (7066) :303-309