Minimally invasive approach for skull base meningiomas

被引:0
作者
Galvez, Carlos Roberto Vargas [1 ]
Arbolay, Omar Lopez [1 ]
Machin, Marlon Manuel Ortiz [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Hermanos Ameijeiras, Serv Neurocirugia, Havana, Cuba
来源
NEUROCIRUGIA | 2024年 / 35卷 / 03期
关键词
Meningioma; Base of skull; Neuroendoscopy; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; ENDOSCOPIC ENDONASAL; TUBERCULUM SELLAE; RESECTION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.neucir.2023.11.002
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Introduction: Skull base meningiomas constitute a complex group of skull base tumors. The endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) and endoscopic Keyhole have a minimally invasive philosophy with high effectiveness, safety, and a significant decrease in postoperative morbidity in these tumors. Objective: To describe the results of the use of minimally invasive approaches to skull base meningiomas. Method: A descriptive, retrospective study was carried out in 140 patients at the "Hermanos Ameijeiras" Hospital who underwent surgery for cranial base meningiomas using minimally invasive approaches to the cranial base. The degree of tumor resection, tumor recurrence, reinterventions, and complications were evaluated. Results: ESA were used in 72.8% of the study, while endoscopic Keyholes were used in 26.4% and combined approaches in 0.7%. In relation to total tumor resection, 91.9% was generally achieved. Overall tumor recurrence and reinterventions were less than 8.5% and 4%, respectively. Complications in ESA were: cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistula (2.1%), diabetes insipidus, hydrocephalus, cerebral infarction, surgical site hematoma, worsening of cranial nerves I-IV (1.4%) respectively. While in the Keyhole type approaches: seizures (2.9%), hydrocephalus (1.4%), CSF fistula (1.4%), worsening of Nerves IX-XII (0.7%). Conclusions: The following study reaffirms that minimally invasive approaches for skull base meningiomas constitute advanced surgical techniques for these tumors, associated with a low rate of postoperative complications. (c) 2023 Sociedad Espanola de Neurocirugia. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 135
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Aum David, 2020, Handb Clin Neurol, V170, P133, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-822198-3.00035-5
  • [2] Endoscopic endonasal versus transcranial approach to tuberculum sellae and planum sphenoidale meningiomas in a similar cohort of patients
    Bander, Evan D.
    Singh, Harminder
    Ogilvie, Colin B.
    Cusic, Ryan C.
    Pisapia, David J.
    Tsiouris, Apostolos John
    Anand, Vijay K.
    Schwartz, Theodore H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 128 (01) : 40 - 48
  • [3] Endoscopic Endonasal and Keyhole Surgery for Skull Base Meningiomas
    Bove, Ilaria
    Cheok, Stephanie
    Ruzevick, Jacob J.
    Zada, Gabriel
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2023, 34 (03) : 393 - 402
  • [4] The Simpson grading: defining the optimal threshold for gross total resection in meningioma surgery
    Brokinkel, Benjamin
    Spille, Dorothee Caecilia
    Brokinkel, Caroline
    Hess, Katharina
    Paulus, Werner
    Bormann, Eike
    Stummer, Walter
    [J]. NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2021, 44 (03) : 1713 - 1720
  • [5] Surgical management of giant sphenoid wing meningiomas encasing major cerebral arteries
    Champagne, Pierre-Olivier
    Lemoine, Emile
    Bojanowski, Michel W.
    [J]. NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2018, 44 (04)
  • [6] Efficacy and outcomes of facial nerve-sparing treatment approach to cerebellopontine angle meningiomas
    D'Amico, Randy S.
    Banu, Matei A.
    Petridis, Petros
    Bercow, Alexandra S.
    Malone, Hani
    Praver, Moshe
    Wang, Tony J. C.
    Isaacson, Steven R.
    Sisti, Michael B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 127 (06) : 1231 - 1241
  • [7] ENDONASAL VERSUS SUPRAORBITAL KEYHOLE REMOVAL OF CRANIOPHARYNGIOMAS AND TUBERCULUM SELLAE MENINGIOMAS
    Fatemi, Nasrin
    Dusick, Joshua R.
    de Paiva Neto, Manoel A.
    Malkasian, Dennis
    Kelly, Daniel F.
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2009, 64 (05) : 269 - 284
  • [8] Petroclival meningiomas: update of current treatment and consensus by the EANS skull base section
    Giammattei, Lorenzo
    di Russo, P.
    Starnoni, D.
    Passeri, T.
    Bruneau, M.
    Meling, T. R.
    Berhouma, M.
    Cossu, G.
    Cornelius, J. F.
    Paraskevopoulos, D.
    Zazpe, I.
    Jouanneau, E.
    Cavallo, L. M.
    Benes, V.
    Seifert, V.
    Tatagiba, M.
    Schroeder, H. W. S.
    Goto, T.
    Ohata, K.
    Al-Mefty, O.
    Fukushima, T.
    Messerer, M.
    Daniel, R. T.
    Froelich, S.
    [J]. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2021, 163 (06) : 1639 - 1663
  • [9] A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: Vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap
    Hadad, Gustavo
    Bassagasteguy, Luis
    Carrau, Ricardo L.
    Mataza, Juan C.
    Kassam, Amin
    Snyderman, Carl H.
    Mintz, Arlan
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2006, 116 (10) : 1882 - 1886
  • [10] Han Y C, 2022, Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi, V57, P810, DOI 10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20210630-00406