Digital tools for stakeholder participation in urban development projects

被引:28
作者
Toukola, Sebastian [1 ]
Ahola, Tuomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Tampere Univ, Ind Engn & Management, POB 527, Tampereen Yliopisto 33014, Finland
来源
PROJECT LEADERSHIP AND SOCIETY | 2022年 / 3卷
关键词
Urban development projects; Digital tools; Stakeholder participation; Stakeholder engagement; Value creation; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; VALUE CREATION; CO-CREATION; FRONT-END; INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT; SOCIAL MEDIA; INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT; CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS; MAJOR INFRASTRUCTURE; GIS PPGIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.plas.2022.100053
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Previous studies have paid scarce attention to engagement of various stakeholders in urban development projects. Therefore, this paper examines the possibilities of using digital tools to enhance stakeholder participation in urban development projects and how digital tools may be associated with value creation in the project planning phase. This qualitative case study builds on data we collected through 17 semistructured interviews and participation in four planning workshops in a middle-sized city in Finland. Our data analysis resulted in a categorisation consisting of six types of digital tools that can be used to engage stakeholders in urban development projects. Our results indicate that digital tools provide multiple opportunities for stakeholder participation and that each tool is associated with specific benefits and sacrifices that contribute to value creation. Furthermore, digital tools were found to positively influence project success and stakeholder satisfaction. Our study offers practical recommendations, especially regarding social media, for effectively integrating various stakeholders, including individual citizens and private actors, into urban development projects.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 157 条
[1]  
Aaltonen K., 2021, Call for Papers: Project Stakeholder Management
[2]   A project lifecycle perspective on stakeholder influence strategies in global projects [J].
Aaltonen, Kirsi ;
Kujala, Jaakko .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2010, 26 (04) :381-397
[3]  
Ahola Tuomas, 2008, International Journal of Project Management, V26, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.08.008
[4]   What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? [J].
Ahvenniemi, Hannele ;
Huovila, Aapo ;
Pinto-Seppa, Isabel ;
Airaksinen, Miimu .
CITIES, 2017, 60 :234-245
[5]  
Alam I, 2002, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V30, P250, DOI 10.1177/00970302030003006
[6]   Value for whom, by whom: investigating value constructs in nonprofit project portfolios [J].
Ang, Karyne ;
Sankaran, Shankar ;
Killen, Catherine .
PROJECT MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2016, 3
[7]   Technology adoption in the BIM implementation for lean architectural practice [J].
Arayici, Y. ;
Coates, P. ;
Koskela, L. ;
Kagioglou, M. ;
Usher, C. ;
O'Reilly, K. .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 20 (02) :189-195
[8]  
Azhar S., 2011, LEADERSH MANAG ENG, V11, P241, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000127, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000127]
[9]   What is wrong with the front-end of infrastructure megaprojects and how to fix it: A systematic literature review [J].
Babaei, Ata ;
Locatelli, Giorgio ;
Sainati, Tristano .
PROJECT LEADERSHIP AND SOCIETY, 2021, 2
[10]   Success factors and criteria in the management of international development projects Evidence from projects funded by the European Union in Ethiopia [J].
Bayiley, Yitbarek Takele ;
Teklu, Getachew Kahsay .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2016, 9 (03) :562-582