Implementation of Complex Suicide Prevention Interventions: Insights into Barriers, Facilitators and Lessons Learned

被引:0
作者
Krishnamoorthy, Sadhvi [1 ]
Mathieu, Sharna [1 ]
Armstrong, Gregory [2 ]
Ross, Victoria [1 ]
Francis, Jillian [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Reifels, Lennart
Kolves, Kairi [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Australian Inst Suicide Res & Prevent, World Hlth Org Collaborating Ctr Res & Training Su, Sch Appl Psychol, Mt Gravatt Campus, Mt Gravatt, Qld 4111, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Nossal Inst Global Hlth, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Sch Hlth Sci, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[4] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Mental Hlth, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Parkville, Vic, Australia
关键词
Barriers; facilitators; implementation science approaches; lessons learned; suicide prevention; PUBLIC-HEALTH; SCIENCE; MODEL; TRANSLATION; RELEVANT;
D O I
10.1080/13811118.2024.2368127
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
IntroductionEffective suicide prevention interventions are infrequently translated into practice and policy. One way to bridge this gap is to understand the influence of theoretical determinants on intervention delivery, adoption, and sustainment and lessons learned. This study aimed to examine barriers, facilitators and lessons learned from implementing complex suicide prevention interventions across the world.Methods and materialsThis study was a secondary analysis of a systematic review of complex suicide prevention interventions, following updated PRISMA guidelines. English published records and grey literature between 1990 and 2022 were searched on PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ProQuest, SCOPUS and CENTRAL. Related reports were organized into clusters. Data was extracted from clusters of reports on interventions and were mapped using the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.ResultsThe most frequently-reported barriers were reported within the intervention setting and were related to the perceived appropriateness of interventions within settings; shared norms, beliefs; and maintaining formal and informal networks and connections. The most frequently reported facilitators concerned individuals' motivation, capability/capacity, and felt need. Lessons learned focused on the importance of tailoring the intervention, responding to contextual needs and the importance of community engagement throughout the process.ConclusionThis study emphasizes the importance of documenting and analyzing important influences on implementation. The complex interplay between the contextual determinants and implementation is discussed. These findings contribute to a better understanding of barriers and facilitators salient for implementation of complex suicide prevention interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 579
页数:24
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Practice-Based Evidence in Public Health: Improving Reach, Relevance, and Results [J].
Ammerman, Alice ;
Smith, Tosha Woods ;
Calancie, Larissa .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, VOL 35, 2014, 35 :47-63
[2]   An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist [J].
Mark S. Bauer ;
Laura Damschroder ;
Hildi Hagedorn ;
Jeffrey Smith ;
Amy M. Kilbourne .
BMC Psychology, 3 (1)
[3]   Reframing implementation science to address inequities in healthcare delivery [J].
Baumann, Ana A. ;
Cabassa, Leopoldo J. .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
[4]   Towards a methodology for cluster searching to provide conceptual and contextual "richness" for systematic reviews of complex interventions: case study (CLUSTER) [J].
Booth, Andrew ;
Harris, Janet ;
Croot, Elizabeth ;
Springett, Jane ;
Campbell, Fiona ;
Wilkins, Emma .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2013, 13
[5]   Harnessing implementation science to improve care quality and patient safety: a systematic review of targeted literature [J].
Braithwaite, Jeffrey ;
Marks, Danielle ;
Taylor, Natalie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2014, 26 (03) :321-329
[6]   Revisiting concepts of evidence in implementation science [J].
Brownson, Ross C. ;
Shelton, Rachel C. ;
Geng, Elvin H. ;
Glasgow, Russell E. .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2022, 17 (01)
[7]   Building Capacity for Evidence-Based Public Health: Reconciling the Pulls of Practice and the Push of Research [J].
Brownson, Ross C. ;
Fielding, Jonathan E. ;
Green, Lawrence W. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, VOL 39, 2018, 39 :27-53
[8]  
Damschroder LJ, 2022, IMPLEMENT SCI, V17, DOI [10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0, 10.1186/s13012-021-01181-5]
[9]   Clarity out of chaos: Use of theory in implementation research [J].
Damschroder, Laura J. .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2020, 283
[10]   Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science [J].
Damschroder, Laura J. ;
Aron, David C. ;
Keith, Rosalind E. ;
Kirsh, Susan R. ;
Alexander, Jeffery A. ;
Lowery, Julie C. .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2009, 4