共 42 条
A viable relief supply chain network design by considering risk and robustness for disaster and crisis management
被引:10
作者:
Lotfi, Reza
[1
,2
]
Nasrabadi, Alireza Motallebi
[3
]
Ali, Sadia Samar
[4
,5
]
Mardani, Nooshin
[6
]
Davoodi, Sayyed Mohammad Reza
[7
]
Aghakhani, Sina
[8
]
机构:
[1] Yazd Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Yazd, Iran
[2] Behineh Gostar Sanaye Arman, Tehran, Iran
[3] McMaster Univ, DeGroote Sch Business, Hamilton, ON L8S 4E8, Canada
[4] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[5] New Delhi Inst Management, Supply Chain Management & Quantitat Tech, New Delhi, India
[6] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Environm, Takestan Branch, Takestan, Iran
[7] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Management, Dehaghan Branch, Dehaghan, Iran
[8] Iowa State Univ, Dept Ind & Mfg Syst Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词:
Viability;
Relief supply chain;
Network design;
Risk;
Robustness;
TIME;
D O I:
10.1007/s10100-024-00920-5
中图分类号:
C93 [管理学];
O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号:
070105 ;
12 ;
1201 ;
1202 ;
120202 ;
摘要:
The research proposes a new Viable Relief Supply Chain Network Design method incorporating Risk and Robustness (VRSCNDRR). Robust Stochastic Optimization (RSO), Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) and maximum function are applied to the cost function as economic and budget constraints. The primary goal of the objective function is to minimize the deviation in the rate of satisfying demand and supply time of commodities for the Disaster Zone (DZ). In addition, CO2 emissions and energy consumption are proposed as sustainability requirements. This research involves several parties, including overseas and inland suppliers supplying the primary components and Distribution Centres (DCs), Health Centres (HCs), and DZs that prepare commodities for people in crisis. The analysis shows that focusing on viability can increase costs by up to 11.32%, deviation from supply demand and time by up to 46.88%, and decrease CO2 emissions and energy consumption by up to 19.25% and 11.95%. Applying viability, risk, and robustness has a 6.75% effect on overall performance. Due to budget constraints, increasing the conservatism coefficient and sustainability requirements can negatively affect supplying demand and energy consumption, but not cost. The agility rate between 60 and 80% affects supplying demand and time, while facility availability fluctuates between 80 and 100%. The primary problem's magnitude is altered, with higher calculation times and exponential models associated with these results.
引用
收藏
页数:36
相关论文