The roots of carbon emission differences between China and USA: A quantitative study based on global value chains

被引:1
作者
Gao, Deting [1 ]
Feng, Guimei [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Coll Econ, 777 Guoding Rd, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
关键词
Carbon emission differences; Structural decomposition analysis; Quantitative structural modeling; Global value chains; POLLUTION HAVEN HYPOTHESIS; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; CO2; EMISSIONS; DIOXIDE EMISSION; TRADE; ENERGY; DRIVERS; IMPACT; RESPONSIBILITY; PRODUCTIVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121476
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China and the USA, as preeminent contributors to global carbon emissions, demonstrate discernible differentials in both magnitude and trajectories of their respective carbon outputs. This article employed two methods, Structural Decomposition Analysis (SDA) and Quantitative Structural Modeling, to scrutinize the underpinnings of these disparities through the lens of the global value chain. Drawing upon data from the World Input-Output Database (WIOD), our analysis revealed that the compounded influences of output composition, input intensity, input composition and input origin collectively elevated China's aggregate carbon footprint from 2000 to 2014, while the scale effect made China's carbon emissions lower than of the USA. Notably, China's carbon emissions surpassed those of USA, with the gap accentuating over time. The quantitative results of the structural model showed that the difference in carbon emissions between China and USA predominantly stem from disparities in productivity, production technology, factor intensity, factor endowment and direct carbon intensity. Differences in trade costs exhibited some discernible impact, their influence remains relatively marginal, whereas distinctions in consumption behaviors and trade imbalances minimally contribute to the observed differentials. These findings have important policy implications for global carbon reduction efforts and China's trajectory towards a low-carbon economic paradigm.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 112 条
  • [21] Embodied carbon dioxide emission at supra-national scale: A coalition analysis for G7, BRIC, and the rest of the world
    Chen, Z. M.
    Chen, G. Q.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (05) : 2899 - 2909
  • [22] Trade and the Environment: New Methods, Measurements, and Results
    Cherniwchan, Jevan
    Copeland, Brian R.
    Taylor, M. Scott
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS, VOL 9, 2017, 9 : 59 - 85
  • [23] Unpacking sources of comparative advantage A quantitative approach
    Chor, Davin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 82 (02) : 152 - 167
  • [24] FDI and the capital intensity of "dirty" sectors: A missing piece of the pollution haven puzzle
    Cole, MA
    Elliott, RJR
    [J]. REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2005, 9 (04) : 530 - 548
  • [25] Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment
    Cole, Matthew A.
    Elliott, Robert J. R.
    Zhang, Liyun
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 42, 2017, 42 : 465 - 487
  • [26] NORTH-SOUTH TRADE AND THE ENVIRONMENT
    COPELAND, BR
    TAYLOR, MS
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1994, 109 (03) : 755 - 787
  • [27] What Goods Do Countries Trade? A Quantitative Exploration of Ricardo's Ideas
    Costinot, Arnaud
    Donaldson, Dave
    Komunjer, Ivana
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2012, 79 (02) : 581 - 608
  • [28] Trade and the greenhouse gas emissions from international freight transport
    Cristea, Anca
    Hummels, David
    Puzzello, Laura
    Avetisyan, Misak
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 65 (01) : 153 - 173
  • [29] Bilateral Trade Imbalances
    Cunat, Alejandro
    Zymek, Robert
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2024, 91 (03) : 1537 - 1583
  • [30] Finance and Green Growth
    De Haas, Ralph
    Popov, Alexander
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2022, 133 (650) : 637 - 668