The roots of carbon emission differences between China and USA: A quantitative study based on global value chains

被引:1
作者
Gao, Deting [1 ]
Feng, Guimei [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Coll Econ, 777 Guoding Rd, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
关键词
Carbon emission differences; Structural decomposition analysis; Quantitative structural modeling; Global value chains; POLLUTION HAVEN HYPOTHESIS; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; CO2; EMISSIONS; DIOXIDE EMISSION; TRADE; ENERGY; DRIVERS; IMPACT; RESPONSIBILITY; PRODUCTIVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121476
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China and the USA, as preeminent contributors to global carbon emissions, demonstrate discernible differentials in both magnitude and trajectories of their respective carbon outputs. This article employed two methods, Structural Decomposition Analysis (SDA) and Quantitative Structural Modeling, to scrutinize the underpinnings of these disparities through the lens of the global value chain. Drawing upon data from the World Input-Output Database (WIOD), our analysis revealed that the compounded influences of output composition, input intensity, input composition and input origin collectively elevated China's aggregate carbon footprint from 2000 to 2014, while the scale effect made China's carbon emissions lower than of the USA. Notably, China's carbon emissions surpassed those of USA, with the gap accentuating over time. The quantitative results of the structural model showed that the difference in carbon emissions between China and USA predominantly stem from disparities in productivity, production technology, factor intensity, factor endowment and direct carbon intensity. Differences in trade costs exhibited some discernible impact, their influence remains relatively marginal, whereas distinctions in consumption behaviors and trade imbalances minimally contribute to the observed differentials. These findings have important policy implications for global carbon reduction efforts and China's trajectory towards a low-carbon economic paradigm.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 112 条
  • [1] Import Competition and the Great US Employment Sag of the 2000s
    Acemoglu, Daron
    Autor, David
    Dorn, David
    Hanson, Gordon H.
    Price, Brendan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, 2016, 34 (01) : S141 - S198
  • [2] The Environment and Directed Technical Change
    Acemoglu, Daron
    Aghion, Philippe
    Bursztyn, Leonardo
    Hemous, David
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (01) : 131 - 166
  • [3] Aichele R., 2016, Going Deep: The Trade and Welfare Effects of TTIP Revised
  • [4] KYOTO AND CARBON LEAKAGE: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE CARBON CONTENT OF BILATERAL TRADE
    Aichele, Rahel
    Felbermayr, Gabriel
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2015, 97 (01) : 104 - 115
  • [5] Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle
    Anderson, JE
    van Wincoop, E
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (01) : 170 - 192
  • [6] Antràs P, 2019, ROUT ERIA ST DEVELOP, P126
  • [7] Trade, informal employment and labor adjustment costs
    Arias, Javier
    Artuc, Erhan
    Lederman, Daniel
    Rojas, Diego
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2018, 133 : 396 - 414
  • [8] New Trade Models, Same Old Gains?
    Arkolakis, Costas
    Costinot, Arnaud
    Rodriguez-Clare, Andres
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (01) : 94 - 130
  • [9] The Big Three and corporate carbon emissions around the world
    Azar, Jose
    Duro, Miguel
    Kadach, Igor
    Ormazabal, Gaizka
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 142 (02) : 674 - 696
  • [10] Quantitative Analysis of Multiparty Tariff Negotiations
    Bagwell, Kyle
    Staiger, Robert W.
    Yurukoglu, Ali
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 2021, 89 (04) : 1595 - 1631