Efficacy and safety of middle turbinate surgery: a systematic review

PurposeMiddle turbinate (MT) surgery is extremely common during endoscopic sinus surgery procedures, though no agreement exists on which techniques provide the best outcomes. This PRISMA-compliant systematic review aims to assess which MT surgery technique yields the least postoperative adverse effects and the best objective and subjective outcomes.MethodsA comprehensive search criteria was conducted in multiple databases up to July 3, 2023, to identify studies reporting surgical treatments of the MT. After screening and quality assessment, 14 articles were included for analysis. Data on patients demographics, surgical approaches, postoperative treatment and follow-up, objective and subjective outcomes were extracted and reviewed.ResultsOut of 173 unique papers identified, 14 articles met the inclusion criteria, predominantly randomized controlled trials (n = 9). Antero-inferior middle turbinectomy was the predominant surgical approach. Most studies evaluated results with postoperative endoscopy, a superior outcome was documented in the intervention group (ten out of eleven cases). In four out five studies using the SNOT-22, the treatment group was associated with a statistically significant improvement. Olfactory questionnaires highlighted superior olfactory outcome in two out of three studies. The UPSIT score revealed no significant difference between groups. Objective olfactory assessments favored treatment groups in both studies utilizing olfactometry.ConclusionsIt seems that a partial MT surgical approach consistently yields subjective and objective improvements compared to conservative measures, also suggesting a positive impact on smell function. Despite it appears that better outcomes with fewer complications are consistently achieved with partial techniques, it remains challenging identifying which partial technique surpasses the others, due to significant heterogeneity among the studies.