Do learners learn from corrective peer feedback? Insights from students

被引:3
作者
Jiang, Xue [1 ]
Ironsi, Sarah Solomon [2 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Normal Univ, Schlool Educ Sci, Harbin, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
[2] Near East Univ, Fac Educ, English Language Teaching, North Cyprus, Turkiye
关键词
Feedback; Corrective feedback; Peer feedback; Students; Education;
D O I
10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101385
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Understanding what students do with the feedback they receive is paramount in the influence of feedback on the learning experience. Likewise, while research recommends peer feedback in classroom settings, understanding what students do with corrective peer feedback is instrumental in studying the impact of peer feedback on students learning. This study explored this understudied aspect of peer feedback through mixed-method research. One hundred fifty participants administered with peer feedback were recruited from 5 universities. After collecting data through questionnaires and interviews, it was analyzed. Results indicate that while corrective peer feedback is overly perceived as effective, students perceive it as an unfair and improper assessment model. Other novel findings were used to make pedagogical conclusions on this topic.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Alsehibany R. A., 2021, PSU Research Review
[2]   Classroom assessment as the co-regulation of learning [J].
Andrade, Heidi L. ;
Brookhart, Susan M. .
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2020, 27 (04) :350-372
[3]   Making peer-feedback more efficient: what conditions of its delivery make the difference? [J].
Armengol-Asparo, Carme ;
Mercader, Cristina ;
Ion, Georgeta .
HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 41 (02) :226-239
[4]   A qualitative inquiry into undergraduates' learning from giving and receiving peer feedback in L2 writing: Insights from a case study [J].
Cao, Zhenhao ;
Yu, Shulin ;
Huang, Jing .
STUDIES IN EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION, 2019, 63 :102-112
[5]  
Chinaza I., 2021, Perceived efficacy of e-proctoring software for emergency remote online based assessment: Perceptions of proctored examinations, P265
[6]   What makes for effective feedback: staff and student perspectives [J].
Dawson, Phillip ;
Henderson, Michael ;
Mahoney, Paige ;
Phillips, Michael ;
Ryan, Tracii ;
Boud, David ;
Molloy, Elizabeth .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (01) :25-36
[7]   A collaborative learning approach to dialogic peer feedback: a theoretical framework [J].
Er, Erkan ;
Dimitriadis, Yannis ;
Gasevic, Dragan .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021, 46 (04) :586-600
[8]  
Godfrey D., 2020, School Peer Review for Educational Improvement and Accountability
[9]   Conditions that enable effective feedback [J].
Henderson, Michael ;
Phillips, Michael ;
Ryan, Tracii ;
Boud, David ;
Dawson, Phillip ;
Molloy, Elizabeth ;
Mahoney, Paige .
HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 38 (07) :1401-1416
[10]   The challenges of feedback in higher education [J].
Henderson, Michael ;
Ryan, Tracii ;
Phillips, Michael .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (08) :1237-1252